Most noteworthy for me is the fact that more Americans think that porn (52%) and homosexuality (39%) are wrong than spanking children (23%) and being ultra wealthy (18%).

🀑 country

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2026/03/19/what-do-americans-consider-immoral/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (41 children)

How is eating meat not morally wrong? Or not a moral issue?

Like genuinely does anyone understand how someone could think that?

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    It's about the scope of the question.

    Eating meat has been natural to humans and their ancestors for about 3 million years. But we have never processed, presented and eaten meat in the way and on the scale that we are doing it today.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    The downvotes on this are both funny and telling. I like it so its good. Asking if its bad is bad.

    I'm actually starting to see the point in a weird way. If they think about as critically as a dog or a cat maybe it doesn't make sense to hold their decisions to a higher moral standard. We don't call it immoral when non-human animals rape other non-human animals because they aren't capable of the level of thought required to conceptualize moral decisions. But, uh, neither are significant amounts of humans apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Do you think cats are immoral? They will most certainly suffer if not die if fed a vegetarian diet.

    It’s not a stretch for someone to think animals eating animals is not a moral issue and it’s not a moral issue for humans, another animal, to do the same.

    If you hold humas to a higher standard then I applaud you for your conviction but I think this survey shows we aren’t really above animals

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    I'm not entirely sure, but I have heard the argument that we kill everything we eat to live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    I've had someone try to tell me that plants feel pain and scream when they die.

    Okay dawg, but I know I'd rather mow my lawn than mow over a field of pigs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not entirely dismissive of the argument. I do think it has a point. Why do pigs get to live? Because they look vaguely like us? Fuck you wheat! You eyeless, legless monstrosity! I don't care how much you enjoy swaying in the wind and basking in the sun. You're literally toast!

    Everything wants to live and is afraid to die. But I do agree dying screaming pigs is much more unsettling than millions of wheat stalks getting slaughtered by a combine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The logical next question becomes: why do you get to live? Everything wants to live and is afraid to die. You aren't special.

    This line of argumentation leads to nihilism at its conclusion. Nothing matters, everything is permitted, kill whatever you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    That's a simple minded misunderstanding of nihilism. It is not a license to just do whatever with no consequences or consideration.

    Nothing matters, because there is no such thing as divine law or morality, so it doesn't matter what you choose to matter to you. That's entirely your opinion to have and dictate your life around. We are free to shape our own reality and morals.

    You're right. We aren't special in the grand scheme. Humans are just another animal in the ecosystem. But I am me and I choose to care about myself, so I choose to care about whether I live or die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You've stopped short of engaging with the actual problem: why should I choose to care about whether you live or die?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    No, I fully engaged with it. You just don't have the logical ability to figure that out so let me explain it simply for you...

    That's entirely up to you to decide. No one can make that decision for you. If you're that shitty of a person then that's for you to choose to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe it's different for you, but people don't always choose to care about things. Rather, it is something that happens to us, so I don't choose to care about the screaming and bleeding of pigs as I run them over with a lawnmower. It's forced on me by my empathy, it was never a choice. I suppose I could choose to care about the grass, but it doesn't happen on its own.

    That's why slaughterhouse work is associated with higher rates of self harm, violence, addiction, alcoholism, overdose, abuse, depression, and suicide. Slaughterers don't choose to care about the animals they kill, it just happens to them. Sometimes they become so psychically wounded that they stop caring, but after that they lose the ability to care about anyone else either.

    Neither do I choose to care if you live or die. It just happens. Unfortunately.

    I do choose to block you, though, because you're going to hurt me again if I don't. I wonder why you chose to hurt me?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    I have a milk cow and it dies of old age. Would it be morally wrong for me to eat it? Just throwing the meat away is morally right?

    It's not a question on how the animals are treated. It's just the morality of eating meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Sure but 99.99% of store meat is not this. Its factory farmed animals stacked in pens living in their own piss and shit their entire lives just before they are slaughtered young

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Yes, and we can argue all day long about the morality of that specific way of raising animals for meat, but that doesn't touch the question of whether or not it's moral to eat meat in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    Okay? So could you explain it to me then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    They just did.

    Eating meat = a neutral action that has no moral dilemma.

    How we produce meat products = a large and complex question that does pose an ethical/moral dilemma centered around methods of production.

    How is that so hard to understand?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Because something is 'natural' does not mean that its moral.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in "has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality". Try reading again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    I have trouble understanding how it could be amoral. Every time you eat meat you are making the choice to contribute to crimes than the holocaust? Who, without your contribution, would have a reduced capacity to commit suffering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    It's food. We have to eat to live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Plenty of people don’t eat any meat and live just fine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    And why does it matter if a person does? Food availability and nutrition has so many variables. Including financial capabilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    How do you feel about people who knowingly, willfully participated in facilitated the holocaust?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (5 children)

    I can eat you therefore kiling and eating you is not morally wrong or a moral issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Are you saying that a person is the same as food that is readily available? Not really smart are you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Rare to see someone so incapable of critical thought lmao

    My logic sounds absurd when you apply it to a different example? why would you use a different example, that makes it sound dumb

    it's fine to eat because it's food and it's food because it's fine to eat. simple as

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    My wife, who is a vegetarian, doesn't consider eating meat immoral. She thinks that it is a personal decision. Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Could you explain why she thinks this way?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    It's partially because she doesn't feel that she has the right to tell people how to live their lives. She's a vegetarian mostly for environmental reasons, rather than for animal rights.

    She's also conflict averse, and the "individual choice" philosophy does tend to de-escalate conversations with meat eaters, who are often hostile to vegetarians.

  • source
  • parent