you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

None corroborated in any meaningful way that I was able to find

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Do you know the "no true Scotsman" fallacy? Because I regret to inform you that I believe you're falling prey to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Are you saying that me remarking the lack of verifiable sources is in somehow a logical fallacy?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    Read again, in case you needed the refresher

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I'm saying that considering the availability of credible accusors, I think you're defining who counts as a credible accusors in a selective way to maintain your prior assumptions.

    I'm not saying this to be snide or disrespectful. I'm just asking if it's possible you're letting a bias go unnoticed.

  • source
  • parent