My problem with articles like these is that I can point out all the issues:

Charging turns out to be fiddly and time-consuming.

No it's not

There's no tap-and-go option, and I need to scan a QR code, download an app, and set up an account. It takes me another 10 minutes because the verification email never turns up.

Yes the FIRST time, this is like saying an iphone is difficult and time consuming... because you have to set it up first

There's no tap-and-go option

You mean this? https://evie.com.au/autocharge/

Just plug in. No app, no tap.

...

The NRMA recommends charging "to 80 per cent unless more range is absolutely needed" as a courtesy to other drivers.

So what did he do? Like a typical petrol driver he:

But for this experiment, I charge from 46 to 100 per cent. It takes about an hour.

._.

This is the thing, if I know he's done a shit job on something I know about, how badly are they writing about topics I don't know about?

Thanks for nothing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

It may or may not surprise you to find out that the oil and auto industry spends billions of dollars on EV assassination articles and hit pieces/lobbying like this.

They try and create a false equivalency, and to the casual reader, succeed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments