you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I think it saw A as the column header, assumed this was Hex, added everything up, and then converted back to Decimal and got 15, because off-by-one errors are unavoidable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    There was no thinking, "assumptions", addition, or conversions. It saw numbers and generated another number that hit it's "this should go next" filter first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yup...the comment above yours is giving copilot way too much credit lol. That shit needs to stay a 1000 miles away from Excel.

    Excel is already a global nightmare, with so many jank should be databases run on it, with AI on top...oh boy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's very true, my comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but that may not have come across fully

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize.

  • source
  • parent