▲ 611 ▼ It's just a matter of time (lemmy.world) submitted 6 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/facepalm@lemmy.world 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 6 months ago (7 children) 1+2+3 = 1+5 = 15 permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (5 children) I think it saw A as the column header, assumed this was Hex, added everything up, and then converted back to Decimal and got 15, because off-by-one errors are unavoidable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 50 points 6 months ago* (4 children) There was no thinking, "assumptions", addition, or conversions. It saw numbers and generated another number that hit it's "this should go next" filter first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] o_oli@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yup...the comment above yours is giving copilot way too much credit lol. That shit needs to stay a 1000 miles away from Excel. Excel is already a global nightmare, with so many jank should be databases run on it, with AI on top...oh boy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago https://xkcd.com/2347 I'm sure you can guess which one that is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 child) That's very true, my comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but that may not have come across fully permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize. permalink fedilink source parent [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago Is copilot written in JavaScript? Concatenation of ints...... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (5 children) I think it saw A as the column header, assumed this was Hex, added everything up, and then converted back to Decimal and got 15, because off-by-one errors are unavoidable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 50 points 6 months ago* (4 children) There was no thinking, "assumptions", addition, or conversions. It saw numbers and generated another number that hit it's "this should go next" filter first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] o_oli@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yup...the comment above yours is giving copilot way too much credit lol. That shit needs to stay a 1000 miles away from Excel. Excel is already a global nightmare, with so many jank should be databases run on it, with AI on top...oh boy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago https://xkcd.com/2347 I'm sure you can guess which one that is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 child) That's very true, my comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but that may not have come across fully permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 50 points 6 months ago* (4 children) There was no thinking, "assumptions", addition, or conversions. It saw numbers and generated another number that hit it's "this should go next" filter first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] o_oli@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yup...the comment above yours is giving copilot way too much credit lol. That shit needs to stay a 1000 miles away from Excel. Excel is already a global nightmare, with so many jank should be databases run on it, with AI on top...oh boy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago https://xkcd.com/2347 I'm sure you can guess which one that is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 child) That's very true, my comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but that may not have come across fully permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yup...the comment above yours is giving copilot way too much credit lol. That shit needs to stay a 1000 miles away from Excel. Excel is already a global nightmare, with so many jank should be databases run on it, with AI on top...oh boy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago https://xkcd.com/2347 I'm sure you can guess which one that is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 point 6 months ago https://xkcd.com/2347 I'm sure you can guess which one that is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 child) That's very true, my comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but that may not have come across fully permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago All good. It's just something I see a lot of people say without sarcasm or irony a lot, and I think it's a dangerous assumption to have about these algorithms. The personification of them has been the biggest boon to the over-hyped adoption and investment they received these past years, so I generally make a point to clarify when I see it, if only to better inform those who might not realize. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago Is copilot written in JavaScript? Concatenation of ints...... permalink fedilink source parent