1112
Anon describes apple's practices (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 1 year ago (10 children)

No it does not. Anyone who refers to a functional machine as a paperweight should be involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Bro what? It's a greentext - it's 4chan. They all need theraphy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sure, but does nobody know what a paperweight is?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Functional machine" is the working term here. But I guess we have different definitions of what counts as "functional" :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago

    We do not have different definitions of a functional machine. If you think they’re overpriced, fine; underperforming per price:performance ratio? Fine. Whatever you want. But brand new Apple products work and you all sound ridiculous defending calling them paperweights.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Cultist detected

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •