you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 7 months ago* (27 children)

Yes but that's backwards of what the comic is representing.

As I said... I don't think any kind of Christian believes that Jesus' blood ever turns into wine.

That doesn't happen anywhere in the text.

So... the joke is... based off of a thing that doesn't happen?

It would be like making a joke based off the idea that Moses can summon floods.

He can't. He's never shown to be able to do that, he's shown to be a water bender who can move water out of the way, but not generate it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (25 children)

    doesn't happen anywhere in the text.

    Religion is more than just the book. Catholics literally believe that the wine at mass is literally Jesus' blood. This is a joke about them. Not about the book that their specific flavor of whatever is based on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (9 children)

    The literally believe the blessing of the Eucharist turns the wine into the blood of their nailed god.

    Not that the blood of Christ turns into wine.

    Hope this helps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

    And then that wine is like 25 proof. ergo, his blood is 25 proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (6 children)

    No catholic is taught this line of thinking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    It's the logical conclusion. If Jesus' blood has alcohol in it, then it's alcoholic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    No where does anyone ever say Jesus'a blood has alcohol in it, except this comic which doesn't follow any religion. This is a misconstrued line of thinking that only you and OP seem to be stuck on.

    Many catholic churches will use whatever liquid is available, it does not, and never had to be wine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure what you're saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus's blood. Right?

    When I have had jesus's blood, it had alcohol in it.

    So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    The wine turns into Jesus's blood when the priest blesses it.

    This comic is the complete opposite of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (9 children)

    I can't believe I'm arguing this..

    In the comic, Jesus isn't turning his blood into wine. He's simply tapping the vein.

    Jesus' blood is naturally alcoholic. We know this because the transubstantiation turns the wine at mass into Jesus' blood, and THAT blood is alcoholic. The fact that the wine was originally alcoholic is completely unrelated. The priests could transubstantiate water into Jesus' blood, and it'd still be alcoholic.

    That's assuming you actually believe in transubstantiation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    There are people who celebrate Eucharist with grape juice and it doesn't turn alcoholic. It's not that transubstantiation makes it alcoholic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

    So you're saying that Jesus blood is different based on who is doing it??

    Sounds like someone is doing it wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    It's the blessing that matters, not the contents of the cup. In transubstantiation the outward characteristics don't change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    Then how do you know it worked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Is your faith so weak that you need proof, Thomas?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Ah. The ol' "don't ask because we have no answers" answer.

    So I believe that transubstantiation only works in the middle east, and we just haven't realized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I don't care what and if you believe but the alcohol in the wine is certainly no proof of transubstantiation. Who would even claim it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Look, I'm not Catholic or any kind of Christian, but...

    Catholics do not believe that Jesus' blood turns into wine.

    So... acting like they do... is just trolling, basically.

    Its not a joke, because it doesn't stem from a thing that someone actually believes.

    It is simply asserting that someone believes a thing they do not... which is trolling.

    There are a vast plethora of ludicrous things that varying kinds of Christians believe are literally true, that you could make an actual joke out of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    That is the opposite of this though, like all the other comments are trying to explain.

    Eucharist = wine and bread turning into Christ's blood and flesh

    Comic = Christ's blood turning into wine

    How are so many people getting that backwards? Are you all trolling?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment