you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

And then that wine is like 25 proof. ergo, his blood is 25 proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (6 children)

    No catholic is taught this line of thinking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    It's the logical conclusion. If Jesus' blood has alcohol in it, then it's alcoholic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    No where does anyone ever say Jesus'a blood has alcohol in it, except this comic which doesn't follow any religion. This is a misconstrued line of thinking that only you and OP seem to be stuck on.

    Many catholic churches will use whatever liquid is available, it does not, and never had to be wine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure what you're saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus's blood. Right?

    When I have had jesus's blood, it had alcohol in it.

    So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments