23
PEP: Is initializing typed variable with None bad practice? (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/python@programming.dev
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For example:

class FooBar:
    def __init__(self):
        self.a: int = None
        self.foo: str = None

Is this bad practice/go against PEP guidelines or is it fine?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

Python advertises itself as being mature, which means changes if any are supposed to be incremental and backwards compatible. It's not so successful at that but I still don't particularly try to keep up with the bleeding edge. I don't know what slots in dataclasses even means. I do like the match statement.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    LOL have never used the match statement. Has been one of those features just outta reach. So close can taste it. But alas ....

    Now py310 is here. Still not enthusiastic about it. But over time maybe will come around.

    __slots__ = (...) or frozen. Same thing. Make the data class read-only reducing memory usage by 30-40%. Like the memory usage difference between tuple and list.

    From experience, in stubs, __slots__ need to include "__weakref__". If frozen, then don't include "__weakref__".

    How about this. Lets meet each other half way.

    I'll stop thinking of the match statement as thorium reactor toxic waste.

    And maybe you can take a read through of the frozen option for dataclasses.

    Sound fair?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •