you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

I switched my laptop to Arch a bit over a year ago but my desktop is still on Windows 11.

The main thing that's holding me back is the lack of raw photo editing software that matches my workflow. I've tried RawTherapee, Darktable, RapidRAW and a couple of others. So far, everything was either cumbersome to use, was missing important features or had suboptimal performance. With dozens if not hundreds of candidates, even one more minute of editing time per photo can quickly add up. Many of my gigs are event photography and my clients often want at least the roughly edited previews within 24-48 hours.

If any of you knows a tool that accurately replicates the UX, feature set and performance of (ideally) Adobe Camera Raw or (not so ideally) Lightroom, you'd make me the happiest photography nerd on the planet. Bonus points if it correctly imports existing development settings in case I need to re-edit or re-export older photos.

PSA: if you recommend I use GIMP, like so many before you did, I will block you. GIMP is not a raw editor and it can't even open most raw formats without help from one of the tools I mentioned above.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I am curious about how Lightroom workflow is better that Darkable for you. I juste started to learn RAW photo editing with darktable and want to learn more about photography in general

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's probably mostly a matter of getting used to the way Darktable does things and where it puts certain controls.

    That's what Camera Raw's basic tab looks like (not my screenshot, I'm at the linux laptop right now). It has most of what I need for a photo to look "okay" before I dive into the other tabs for more in-depth edits. I'm sure Darktable has equivalent functions to all of those (they're very basic after all) but at least with the default UI presets, I need to look through many different tabs and modules with unfamiliar names to find them.

    Then there's warnings like "White balance applied twice". Apparently I'm not allowed to use the white balance sliders because the color calibration module already applies white balance? But that module doesn't provide an intuitive way to select color temperature and tint?

    I'm sure I could get used to all of that. But right now I don't have the time or energy to learn a completely new editing workflow from scratch. Many open source tools suffer from programmer UI syndrome (I'm allowed to say that, I'm a programmer myself). They do everything the lead maintainer needs them to do but you often need to be intimately familiar with the software's inner workings to understand what each control in the UI does. I don't want to think about the differences between "linear Bradford (ICC v4)", "non-linear Bradford" and "CAT16 (CIECAM16)" color calibration formulas, especially not when I've set my UI to "workflow: beginner". I just want to make my photo a tiny bit warmer. Give me sensible defaults and put the super detailed settings out of the way until I need them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Thanks for the feedback ! Makes sense, different tools for different purposes I guess. I like Darkatble because it goes in depth with how things work (linear Bradford thing for instance) and I am more into a learning intention rather than a productive and professional objective.

  • source
  • parent