you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

Are the numbers real?

annual revenue of backing company:

  • ubuntu/debian: ca. 300m$
  • suse: ca. 700m$

That's astonishing

I fully support the choice of fedora with bootc. It's an amazing technology. But it's somewhat sad that it's not a European linux base for European institutions.

Edit: Nunbers for suse are correct: ARR FY 664.9

Source

Ubuntu is also correct

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Oh imagine if canonical gave even a fraction of that back to Debian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    You mean like by hiring a significant chunk of Debian maintainers, including the most active apt developer, by having their employees maintain a significant chunk of Debian packages, and by explicitly upstreaming their patches to Debian?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Fedora Kionite because no one likes gnome 3. Suse ane ubuntu are also good choices. SELinux or Apparmor? That is the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments