▲ 293 ▼ J.K.Rowling is a pedo (quokk.au) submitted 9 months ago by Deceptichum to c/peoplemastodon 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (5 children) https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01739806.pdf permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] officermike@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children) Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago At a minimum, pedo apologist. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (1 child) Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds? I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago A: “can you introduce me to JK Rowling? Also remember Julie?” Epstein: “sure I remember Julie” (͡•_ ͡• ) Where does it say Epstein is friends with JK? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] officermike@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children) Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago At a minimum, pedo apologist. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (1 child) Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds? I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago At a minimum, pedo apologist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (1 child) Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds? I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago A: “can you introduce me to JK Rowling? Also remember Julie?” Epstein: “sure I remember Julie” (͡•_ ͡• ) Where does it say Epstein is friends with JK? permalink fedilink source parent
