you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds?

    I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.

  • source
  • parent