you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago

Just tossing you levers:

Identity is the "skeleton" on-which ego "the flesh" forms.

Spontaneously-removing-racism's distortion-of-government would have violent backlash, because it'd cost unearned-privilege greatly.

Political-process selects-for DarkTriad: therefore if anybody wants to create a categorically-better-system, they have to prevent DarkTriad from being advantaged in the replacement, even systematically-disadvantaged ( which they will fight violently to prevent ).

The best-for-the-world & best-for-civilization changes de-politics, de-ideology, make-rational, & make-objective, forcing better-for-the-world & better-for-civilization, but that is politically-intolerable.

Political-motivation & objective-rational-altruism are mutually-exclusive paradigms.

Ideological-identity won't tolerate world-citizen/global-citizen/gaia-citizen to supplant them from authority.

That guy Franck, South African Black man, who bluntly says that the Whites civilized South Africa, but when the Blacks took-over, then civilization fell-apart, nothing working.. he's anchoring on the wrong thing: it isn't skin-color, it is what culture someone grew-up-in.

Same as the gaslighters who pretend that it is race which decides criminality in the US, instead of class.

Just check the criminality-rates of Whites & Blacks of the upper-middle-class, the middle-class, & the underclass/ghetto, & then the truth'd be visible, but they WON'T ALLOW that framing, because it cuts into their ideological distortion/belief.

False-framing is a weapon of ideology.

I don't know if Franck knowingly-rejects that it is culture instead of race.

But the evidence is that in the US, knowingly-rejecting truth is absolutely normal, for ideology.

Therefore, ideology is incompatible with national-viability.

_ /\ _

  • source
  • parent