It seems like a weird point to bring up. How often do y'all convert your measurements? It's not even a daily thing. If I'm measuring something, I either do it in inches, or feet, rarely yards. I've never once had to convert feet into miles, and I can't imagine I'm unique in this. When I have needed to, it's usually converting down (I.e. 1/3 of a foot), which imperial does handle better in more cases.

Like. I don't care if we switch, I do mostly use metric personally, it just seems like a weird point to be the most common pro-metric argument when it's also the one I'm least convinced by due to how metric is based off of base 10 numbering, which has so many problems with it.

Edit: After reading/responding a lot in the comments, it does seem like there's a fundamental difference in how distance is viewed in metric/imperial countries. I can't quite put my finger on how, but it seems the difference is bigger than 1 mile = 1.6km

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (20 children)

Which is fair enough. But now I'm annoyed that they keep complaining about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago* (10 children)

    tbh... being in Canada sucks ass because of it.

    here's a fun flowchart for Canadians and living with both

    and don't get me started on date formatting...

    wtf is 1/4/2026. is that January, or April. who sent this.. where are they located?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    As always, the only correct date format is ISO 8601

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Correct! And yet....

    wtf is 2026/1/4? is that January, or April. who sent this.. where are they located?

    Though to be fair the chances of ISO 8601 goes up when year comes first

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    I mean, if it's normalized to ISO 8601, then you KNOW that's January 4th even without dashes or slashes. (although preeeetty sure the standard would require zeros before the 1 and 4 in either case)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Oof. A good while back, I worked in a US-based company with offices globally, and they upgraded to a global ERP system. At launch of the new system, documents (such as purchase orders) printed with dates in MM/DD/YYYY format. Thankfully, my suggestion to change that to DD Mmm YYYY (eg. 31 Jan 2026) was quickly implemented without any pushback, but it totally blows my mind that a company operating globally would default to such an ambiguous date format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    It's a better system for me, because I already know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Metric is very easy to learn, so I'm not sure I'd go around flaunting that reason...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It is easy to learn how to convert between metric units. But that's not what people mean when they talk about "learning metric". They mean having an intuitive sense for how much, say, 100 meters or 100 milliliters is. Again, the emphasis on how easy it is to remember the conversion between meters and kilometers is extraneous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    And that's how I know you're an American!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Same reason the metric people keep telling me to change. Because if I did, it would be better for them. Difference is, I don't drone on and on about how superior my forms of measurement are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Well that's because it isn't lol.

    My guess is, if the USA method was better:

    The USA would sanction countries until they adopted it. They would embed it in the national flag and insert it in the national anthem. They would make underwear out of it and put stickers on their 20yard-long cars.

  • source
  • parent