you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That is a very different argument from no one being around to run the economy. I don't necessarily disagree, but I don't think that the ratio of workers to owners will change meaningfully before the system is at a breaking point due to missing labour. Not having children also doesn't preclude you from working to induce mass action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Ok I just don't see a reasonable way that less children helps to fight the oligarchy. Not having enough nurses to take care of all the dying boomers does what to further the cause? Eliminating labor doesn't work the same way as withholding labor. I can't exactly imagine a childless adult union so what would the plan even be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment