219
How do people actually fall into the "Tankie" mindset? (anarchist.nexus)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
423 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

After seeing a megathread praising Mao Zedong, an actual mass killer, and a post about a guy saying "99% of westerners are 100000000000% sure they know what happened in 'Tiny Man Square' [...] the reasons for this are complex and involve propaganda [...]," I am genuinely curious what leads people to this belief system. Even if propaganda is involved when it comes to Tiananmen Square, it doesn't change the atrocities that were/are committed everywhere else in China.

I am all for letting people believe what they want but I am lost on why one would deliberately praise any authoritarian system this hard.

Can someone please help me understand why this is such a large and prominent community? How have these ideals garnered such a following outside of China?

EDIT: Thank you to everyone who has responded! This thread has been very insightful :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Not really, no. Words have definitions. It's not a "semantic argument' to clarify the definition of a word. It's not "no true Scotsman" either, that's when you define a group by some unrelated or incidental quality. What I've referred to is the definition of a tankie. The quality described is neither unrelated nor incidental.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    What I’ve referred to is the definition of a tankie.

    Oh, I see, you're the authority on definitions, so whatever you say goes. Even the term "semantic argument" will be bent to mean whatever is convenient for your argument. Can you define "bad faith argument," lol?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Uh, no. I just have the ability to look up definitions. The word means what it means

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    You said...

    Tankies aren’t communists, they’re authoritarians with a red paint job.

    Per the definition:

    Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists

    So you have the ability to look up definitions, just not to read them, apparently.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I know what it says, but "authoritarian communist" is an oxymoron, like "carnivorous vegan". They may call themselves communists, they may be members of a party that calls itself "communist", but authoritarianism cannot coexist with a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

    Sloppy editing does not change that fact, and there is extensive literature and commentary providing clarification.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent