Archived copies of the article:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Except… they’re not the same thing. Geoengineering has been going on for over half a century, and involves dumping particles into different layers of the atmosphere. These particles are generally inert, but cause localized condensation.

That’s a totally different thing than the chemtrail conspiracies which argue that chemicals that aren’t inert are being distributed to make it into the air we breathe and the water we drink in order to alter the behavior of people.

Chemtrails are effectively closer to microplastic pollution than they are to geoengineering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why do people down vote documented facts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I could post documented facts about the chemtrails ants leave, and I’d be voted down too.

    Because neither is really what the discussion is about here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Er. My links are directly linked to chemtrail conspiracies. Not ants. e.g.

    One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population

  • source
  • parent