you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Revolution isn't the same as just killing random people. It isn't difficult to comprehend that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Killing non random people is also bad. It shouldn't be difficult to comprehend that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Lol are you five? Killing powerful fascists is an objective good for humanity, and allowing them to live is an objective harm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If you killed him while he was in power, it could be seen as self defense, which is legitimate. If you had him in captivity, he'd certainly deserve the death penalty but I'm against the death penalty and that applies without exception.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Read my edit. A fascist on the loose equals dead innocents. And Lyudmila would know, she watched them kill twenty four million people in her country for the crime of being the wrong kind of European. There is no coexistence with nazis, because their exterminationist ideology precludes it. You either stop the threat or it kills everyone, no middle ground. Every dead fascist is self defense.

  • source
  • parent