116
Libxml2 Becomes Officially Unmaintained After Maintainer Steps Down (linuxiac.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In mid-September, we reported that Nick Wellnhofer, the long-time maintainer of the widely used XML parsing library libxml2, planned to step down from the project. A few days ago, that change became official.

When looking at one of the latest commits in the project’s GitLab repository, you can now see the following notice:

“This project is unmaintained and has known security issues (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/346). It is foolish to use this software to process untrusted data.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 11 months ago (15 children)

I hope this is a nail in the coffin for xml. It's just so unpleasant to work with, even through great libraries.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Don’t podcasts and RSS still rely heavily on XML?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Lots of stuff uses XML still.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's super underselling it. Open Financial Exchange OFX is still the go-to for markets and banks to exchange information with various end user devices. ISO 20022 is a standard used in banking that is XML based. Fedwire, the platform that moves money between the central banks completed transition to XML in July... of this year.

    Credit reporting agencies, insurance agencies, hospitals, medicare, medicaid, massive amounts of the entire global logistics industry are heavily using XML with no plans in the near future to move off of it. Like the network that handles auto insurance claims and reporting them to people like LexisNexus is all XML.

    Like it's impossible to cover just how much of this planet runs on XML.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    It was in fact these non-browser interests that initially poisoned W3C to take the position of completely abandoning html for XML back in 2004... Where the browser companies immediately ignored the decision and formed their own working group (whatwg) which worked on almost all new web technologies post html4.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Sure it is, but I don't see a good enough replacement.
    Although I have only used XML a couple of times, which were in other people's projects, and considering their low complexity, they might as well have used JSON, XML does have a space where JSON is not good enough.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Out of curiosity, why do you consider XML unpleasant to work with?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Not the one you asked, but I don’t like XML compared to alternatives like JSON.

    The main problem with XML is that it’s an unnecessarily complicated standard. There are often multiple ways to represent the same thing, each with their own gotchas and drawbacks.

    JSON on the other hand has a much simpler standard. The entire JSON standard fits easily in one page. It’s also closer to how data is actually represented in memory. There’s often one ideal way to represent whatever you have in memory to a JSON file, and the reverse is also true.

    Despite it’s simplicity, JSON covers most cases XML would cover. Often in a more elegant way.

    If you like pain, then XML is the right choice for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent