you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 191 points 11 months ago (19 children)

Linus from LTT asks Linus if he'd ever heard of software developers being terminated based on how many lines of code they'd written .

Linus Torvalds responds "Anyone who thinks that's a valid metric is too stupid to work at a tech company..."

It's clear Torvalds doesn't know who this is about when questioned.

Linus hints to him it's about Musk.

"Apparently I was spot on [about Elon Musk being such and individual who is too stupid to work at a tech company]."

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 11 months ago (16 children)

    I'm not even a computer guy, but even I can see how just using the number of lines of code as a metric would be an extremely stupid method for determining effectiveness. Quality should ALWAYS rule over Quantity, but billionaires are obsessively into quantity, to an extremely unhealthy degree (it's a mental illness, OCD, hoarding, etc.), that's how they become billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I'm going to set my terminal width to 1 character. That way my "lines" of code count goes way up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 11 months ago

    That's the kind of thinking that a Sociopathic Oligarch could get behind, which is entirely the problem. Gaming and/or hacking the system is preferable to doing things properly. They want to be "disruptive," even when it's ill-advised.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Imagine trying to read that tho. Suddenly English is formatted vertically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Imagine trying to read that

    Kernel code is very often a series of short words, and very often formatted to take a lot of vertical space (i.e lines of code). It can be hard to read, especially when it's a short code that corresponds to a longer function or location; but with practice we can cope.

    tho

    See? You're expecting people to do it already. And kernel code conforms to the grammar a lot more than American 'english.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    An Ask Lemmy topic recently was "what are some video games that don't exist." I gave three answers, but held one back because it does technically exist.

    SQIJ! for the ZX Spectrum was designed to be terrible by a programmer that, as I understand it, was contractually obligated to program a game, but had grown to hate the company. He wrote a game that turned the caps lock on so none of the movement keys worked, and if you edit the code with a memory poke to turn caps lock off, you'll find there's no game. It was written in BASIC, and the first line is the most passive aggressive thing I've ever read:

    1 goto 2

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Here's a very simple example.

    What's 3^3?

    Or,

    Well it's 3x3x3

    Which is 3+3+3, 3 times.

    Which is 3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3, which is 27.

    Which solution do we prefer?

    3^3 = 27?

    Or

    3+3+3

    +3+3+3

    +3+3+3

    =27?

    Which one uses more lines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I prefer 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I know a CSO of a Biotech who is too stupid to be working in any biomedical research. Guy has a 30 year track record of failures, never worked on a successful drug and he just keeps getting promoted... he's literally stupid.

  • source
  • parent