you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 102 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (32 children)

Before the influx of "just use jellyfin" bros come in let me get ahead of it.

I ran Plex for a decade and loved it, had the subscription, was happy to pay for software I found value in. This however was the kicker, not because it i was directly affected (not because I had a lifetime subscription), but it signaled the end of Plex that I knew from before.

So I did switch. It was not easy or painless like people here claim. Metadata is stored in different ways that made conversion difficult. I tried multiple conversion tools and none of them worked for me, or left my library in a half state. I ended up just staring from scratch, and it was a couple of months before I was happy with it.

That being said, I think it's worth it. It's pretty much at feature parity, but mostly because Plex hasn't been doing anything for server owners while jellyfin devs have been for years now. I'm happier with jellyfin than I was with Plex.

So, to the "I use jellyfin LOL" guys here, no that's not helpful, and it's condescending. It pushes people away, but I have a weird feeling they want to push people away (and honestly if that's your only comment it's the same energy as crypto bros).

Instead, I empathize with Plex hosters, I was there, it's not a fun place to be anymore, and I am here to say that yes you can switch, no it's not as easy as Plex, but I personally think it's worth the effort. With all open source things the user interface and experience is definitely lacking, but if you're willing to put in the time it will be worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    The conversion is not the biggest issue. For my dad or Grandmother to stream my content, Plex as a streaming app is something they can easily understand and digest (though Plex's new streaming app has done quite a bit to undo that -_-). I have the subscription, I acquire the content, I choose who to share it with. Now they need a subscription, too? Where's the value? Why wouldn't they just pay for a streaming service at that point? I'm using my hardware and doing all the work and they are paying Plex? And if I accepted payment for the same thing it would be a crime! BUT I'm not sure I'm comfortable opening Jellyfin to the internet, even behind nginx, and I don't want to have to spend time setting things up for them or troubleshooting their issues w/ Jellyfin. I put enough labor into this thing already.

    So yes obviously everyone should switch to the FOSS option, but in reality it's not that simple because the services aren't 1:1.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    They do not need a subscription, assuming you (the server owner) have a plex pass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    That is what I thought, until this article. I'd be pleased to find out I misinterpreted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    The title of this article is vague.

    Here is the important part

    Under the new rules announced in March, a server owner needs to have a Plex Pass subscription, which starts at $7 per month, to grant users remote access to their server. Alternatively, someone can remotely access another person’s Plex server by buying their own Plex Pass

    TLDR; there has to be at least one pass in the chain

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    BUT I'm not sure I'm comfortable opening Jellyfin to the internet, even behind nginx, and I don't want to have to spend time setting things up for them or troubleshooting their issues w/ Jellyfin. I put enough labor into this thing already.

    This is still where I'm at too. It's a great service, but the fear of messing something up when opening it up to the internet is too worrying. I'm usually pretty good picking up new tech with easier setups, but when there are 4 different networking techniques with their own pros and cons, at that point it's just easier to just run as a local service.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yes! I'm glad you mentioned the crime! If you own a DVD and rip it - that itself is a grey area that is mostly acceptable now. However, sharing it digitally is another grey area that providers have been skimming under the radar, but by requiring a subscription that is 100% illegal. You cannot pay for shared content. I think they're trying to get around it but personally, I just want to avoid the whole thing. Jellyfin was a no brainer from that aspect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    How are you doing remote streaming with Jellyfin?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I'm in the open, but have a proxy and a nested domain so it can't be automatically port scanned. It's a tradeoff I made for simpler setup for my family, and so far it's been fine. I could do tailscale, but there's no way my family would be in favor of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, switching isn't that easy. Especially if you have a lot of "unique" media types with different requirements for scraping metadata. Things like anime, audio books, or comedy albums.

    TBF Plex doesn't handle those all that well either from a stock install. It was a lot of work to get it to handle everything well.

    But also, Plex's proxy service for remote streaming, is it's killer feature that prevents me from switching. I need to access my media from networks where my private domain is blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    fair assessment. there are two major features i still miss from plex:

    1. bulk editing metadata
    2. smart playlists

    also setting up users with tailscale is a struggle, even the ones relatively tech literate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    There's no Jellyfin app for my TV, and it's shit in the TVs browser

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I swapped to jellyfin and it was worth it but it was a lot of work. I had to pay for a static ip, set up my home network properly, and redo all my metadata. and months later I'm still finding missing or incorrectly tagged media. plus it doesn't auto update. also I had to tell my friends and family to download a new app and make logins for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Until Jellyfin is as easy to use for Normals AND it has an actual appleTV app, it’s a nonstarter for me.

    Plex is enforcing a change they announced months ago and ONLY requires the server owner to have plex pass which you should already because it’s absolutely worth it. Now, if they made it that my mom and friends and everyone else I share to needed a pass, that’s a different story.

    Supporting plex with a pass makes sense. The software is stable and constantly worked on (regardless if you like the changes or not) so Pass is worth it for the features it unlocks.

    Jellyfin is great for single users watching on non-Apple hardware in their own home. For me (and I suspect many others) I’m not jumping ship unless Jellyfin either significantly improves on what I need or Plex enshittifies to a point where it’s untenable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I never once found plex to be user friendly for me, it required me to leave my laptop running at all times or buy a dedicated pc for it. I find it infinitely easier to just Pirate what I want and put it on a usb stick or hdmi the laptop to the tv. For me plex was always a thing I felt I never had a use for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    it required me to leave my laptop running at all times or buy a dedicated pc for it.

    Yeah, that's not exactly a software issue ... you can't stream data out of thin air.

    find it infinitely easier to just Pirate what I want and put it on a usb stick or hdmi the laptop to the tv.

    That's pretty cute, but get's kind of tedious when you have thousands of movies and tens-of-thousand TV show episodes. That's when you'll see the need for a software like plex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I can’t view thousands of movies and episodes at once, why would I want it all on my HD? Anyways, plex just seems like a bloated solution to a problem it invented.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe you want to watch them later?

    Anyway, I suggest you don't use it then and keep on shuffling around with your usb stick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    As someone with too many shows and movies on my Plex, I agree with his methods.

    My life would be simpler if I torrented, watched once, and deleted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    I disagree. What if you want to rewatch some old obscure show? Also I share my server with a bunch of people, it would be very hard to keep track of what everyone wants to watch with an on-demand system.

    Also streaming services removing shows is one of my pet peeve, so I'm really against deleting anything.

  • source
  • parent