you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Luckily DNS is somewhat decentralized.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Yeah, I don't get the point of including a protocol together with 3 big corpos. Use a recursive resolver (with caching) instead of a forwarding one, and it's fully decentralised at the TLD level. If the root nameservers or .com's stop responding, either your uplink is down or the internet as we know it has ended

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    It’s still always DNS for some reason

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    "It can't be DNS!"

    "... It was DNS."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    for some reason

    You mean things tend to fail at the highly redundant eventually consistent format-agnostic global distributed database and not on the stateless data transformers?

    Who could have guessed?

  • source
  • parent