114
Steam Hardware Announcement (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (24 children)

I know nothing about hardware development but I think it needs to have the computing power based on the inside out tracking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

    It can't use the same compute power for both simultaneously. Take the same hardware and remove the local gaming and suddenly you need much less power/have much more power. Not to mention you don't need a battery.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Well I think you have a great conclusion that the bigscreen is probably a better fit for you since this headset might not fit your needs. I love my bigscreen v2 would definitely recommend (though I do hate the cable and the swimming goggles effect, and the eye tracking sucks right now) but other than that it is awesome

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    The battery is in the strap anyway and the additional weight for compute is likely very negligible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (16 children)

    The battery is on your head, with the rest of the headset. Weight is a concern of the power required, not the available compute. The bigger concern is cost.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (15 children)

    The battery is functioning as a counterweight and is optional.

    cost, absolutely valid though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (14 children)

    Oh, so you can hardwire it to the PC without a battery!?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)

    I don't see why not, but you probably wouldn't want to because the battery is a perfect counterweight, making it much more comfortable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    Do you wear a counterweight with your sunglasses? No one complains about the lack of counterweight on a Bigscreen. In fact everyone seems to agree it's the most comfortable headset ever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    It doesn't have inside-out tracking. You can't have both.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    And why not?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras and a processor as well as a way to cool it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras

    The cameras are the size of a pea

    and a processor as well as a way to cool it.

    Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children)

    Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking...

    the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (6 children)

    Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking...

    It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (5 children)

    It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2.

    I don't know how they're sending that much data over it

    They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    According to LTT, the section containing the computer just weights under 190 grams (that's about the weight of an average medium-sized apple).

    The battery is the counterweight.. which is actually a good thing to have.. I have a fist generation Quest and the main problem with that one was the weight distribution. Adding weight to the back actually made it more bearable. Just by looking at how thin the front part of this one is, I can tell this is gonna be so much more comfortable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    the section containing the computer just weights under 190 grams

    Cool, the entire Bigscreen Beyond weighs 127 grams.

    The battery is the counterweight..

    Do you typically put on a counterweight with your sunglasses?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •