▲ 114 ▼ Steam Hardware Announcement (www.youtube.com) submitted 1 year ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml 38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (11 children) It doesn't have inside-out tracking. You can't have both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (10 children) And why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras and a processor as well as a way to cool it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras The cameras are the size of a pea and a processor as well as a way to cool it. Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago (10 children) And why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras and a processor as well as a way to cool it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras The cameras are the size of a pea and a processor as well as a way to cool it. Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras and a processor as well as a way to cool it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras The cameras are the size of a pea and a processor as well as a way to cool it. Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children) Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras The cameras are the size of a pea and a processor as well as a way to cool it. Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago* (7 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (6 children) Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking... It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (5 children) It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (4 children) They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 point 11 months ago* You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2. I don't know how they're sending that much data over it They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution. permalink fedilink source parent