114
Steam Hardware Announcement (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Do you wear a counterweight with your sunglasses? No one complains about the lack of counterweight on a Bigscreen. In fact everyone seems to agree it's the most comfortable headset ever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    It doesn't have inside-out tracking. You can't have both.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    And why not?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras and a processor as well as a way to cool it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Inside out tracking requires an array of cameras

    The cameras are the size of a pea

    and a processor as well as a way to cool it.

    Where's the processor in the Bigscreen Beyond? 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking...

    the cameras themselves are not the problem, it's all the processing and cooling required to make that work along with the processing for passthrough and many other things. I doubt this headset would be much lighter if it was not standalone and still had inside out tracking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking...

    It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2.

    I don't know how they're sending that much data over it

    They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent