▲ 698 ▼ Democrats: Stop dividing the left (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 213 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 35 points 1 year ago (24 children) Democrats are right wing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -12 points 1 year ago (23 children) I suppose you are both referring to USA politics: it seems clear that dems contains many different souls but I wouldn't call AOC or Sanders right-wing, even here in Europe where we actually have real left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Both pro-war candidates. Sanders voted to bomb like 8 countries, and AOC has supported israel many times with her votes also, like the iron dome. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago Bernie Sanders is not a democrat. He is the longest-serving Independent in Congress. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 1 year ago (19 children) The left starts at anti-capitalism. Anything other than that is right wing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (11 children) Don't Sanders, Mamdani, and AOC call for socialist reforms in the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 1 year ago (10 children) Reformism is not anti-capitalism. Reforms are just nicer capitalism. There will still be capitalism and imperialism but people just get a bigger slice of the imperialist pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Left and right are relative to the actual political spectrum of the subject. There are different approaches to anticapitalism, centrist on the left-wing wants to implement social politics to improve welfare, this doesn't make it socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Your notion is a very post modernist ideology of absolute relativism, which is an idealist unscientific notion. Socialism starts at anti-capitalism. Anything pro-capitalist is not left wing because everything falls under liberalism which is not a left wing ideology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -12 points 1 year ago* (2 children) And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. The right wing starts at fascism. Or so it has evolved to. Vote against fascism next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. Anything but enthusiastic complicity with genocide and capitulation to republicans is "why trump won" according to the wing that would rather have trump win than tell netanyahu no ever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago Trump won with a sliver of majority support in a handful of states because of electoral college fuckery. Every state he lost could have voted against him 10 times harder and he still would have won. The swing votes he won in those few states were people fundamentally worried about the same things we are. Childcare, healthcare, cost of living, and keeping their jobs. They had two choices, a man who had a plan, and a woman who said "look how not that guy I am!" Trump won because he's mastered the grift and the Democrats dropped the fucking ball, again. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cruel@programming.dev -12 points 1 year ago Anti-capitalists working on socialist reforms are right-wing, and you oppose them? You guys are truly destined for irrelevancy. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago You have two examples of non-quisling democrats, and one isn't even a democrat. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -12 points 1 year ago (23 children) I suppose you are both referring to USA politics: it seems clear that dems contains many different souls but I wouldn't call AOC or Sanders right-wing, even here in Europe where we actually have real left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Both pro-war candidates. Sanders voted to bomb like 8 countries, and AOC has supported israel many times with her votes also, like the iron dome. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago Bernie Sanders is not a democrat. He is the longest-serving Independent in Congress. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 1 year ago (19 children) The left starts at anti-capitalism. Anything other than that is right wing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (11 children) Don't Sanders, Mamdani, and AOC call for socialist reforms in the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 1 year ago (10 children) Reformism is not anti-capitalism. Reforms are just nicer capitalism. There will still be capitalism and imperialism but people just get a bigger slice of the imperialist pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Left and right are relative to the actual political spectrum of the subject. There are different approaches to anticapitalism, centrist on the left-wing wants to implement social politics to improve welfare, this doesn't make it socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Your notion is a very post modernist ideology of absolute relativism, which is an idealist unscientific notion. Socialism starts at anti-capitalism. Anything pro-capitalist is not left wing because everything falls under liberalism which is not a left wing ideology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -12 points 1 year ago* (2 children) And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. The right wing starts at fascism. Or so it has evolved to. Vote against fascism next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. Anything but enthusiastic complicity with genocide and capitulation to republicans is "why trump won" according to the wing that would rather have trump win than tell netanyahu no ever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago Trump won with a sliver of majority support in a handful of states because of electoral college fuckery. Every state he lost could have voted against him 10 times harder and he still would have won. The swing votes he won in those few states were people fundamentally worried about the same things we are. Childcare, healthcare, cost of living, and keeping their jobs. They had two choices, a man who had a plan, and a woman who said "look how not that guy I am!" Trump won because he's mastered the grift and the Democrats dropped the fucking ball, again. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cruel@programming.dev -12 points 1 year ago Anti-capitalists working on socialist reforms are right-wing, and you oppose them? You guys are truly destined for irrelevancy. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago You have two examples of non-quisling democrats, and one isn't even a democrat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Both pro-war candidates. Sanders voted to bomb like 8 countries, and AOC has supported israel many times with her votes also, like the iron dome. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago Bernie Sanders is not a democrat. He is the longest-serving Independent in Congress. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 1 year ago (19 children) The left starts at anti-capitalism. Anything other than that is right wing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (11 children) Don't Sanders, Mamdani, and AOC call for socialist reforms in the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 1 year ago (10 children) Reformism is not anti-capitalism. Reforms are just nicer capitalism. There will still be capitalism and imperialism but people just get a bigger slice of the imperialist pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Left and right are relative to the actual political spectrum of the subject. There are different approaches to anticapitalism, centrist on the left-wing wants to implement social politics to improve welfare, this doesn't make it socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Your notion is a very post modernist ideology of absolute relativism, which is an idealist unscientific notion. Socialism starts at anti-capitalism. Anything pro-capitalist is not left wing because everything falls under liberalism which is not a left wing ideology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -12 points 1 year ago* (2 children) And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. The right wing starts at fascism. Or so it has evolved to. Vote against fascism next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. Anything but enthusiastic complicity with genocide and capitulation to republicans is "why trump won" according to the wing that would rather have trump win than tell netanyahu no ever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago Trump won with a sliver of majority support in a handful of states because of electoral college fuckery. Every state he lost could have voted against him 10 times harder and he still would have won. The swing votes he won in those few states were people fundamentally worried about the same things we are. Childcare, healthcare, cost of living, and keeping their jobs. They had two choices, a man who had a plan, and a woman who said "look how not that guy I am!" Trump won because he's mastered the grift and the Democrats dropped the fucking ball, again. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cruel@programming.dev -12 points 1 year ago Anti-capitalists working on socialist reforms are right-wing, and you oppose them? You guys are truly destined for irrelevancy. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (11 children) Don't Sanders, Mamdani, and AOC call for socialist reforms in the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 1 year ago (10 children) Reformism is not anti-capitalism. Reforms are just nicer capitalism. There will still be capitalism and imperialism but people just get a bigger slice of the imperialist pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 1 year ago (10 children) Reformism is not anti-capitalism. Reforms are just nicer capitalism. There will still be capitalism and imperialism but people just get a bigger slice of the imperialist pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (8 children) "People get a bigger slice of the ... pie until the ruling class decides to take the slice away" Isn't that just the same with all systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (7 children) The state is the mechanism through which one class exerts its dominance over the others. Bourgeois states are the enforcement arm of capital. When it offers improved conditions, it is merely a carrot to prevent you from taking actions that may jeopardize its power. In a similar vein, proletarian controlled states can do the same, but the concessions go towards capital and the day-to-day ruling is on behalf of the workers. If we want concessions that cannot be revoked, we must overthrow the bourgeois state and replace with a workers state. We cannot reform our way into a society where capital does not have near complete power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) proletarian controlled states can do the same This is as much a utopia as capitalist "trickle down economy". It cannot exist because proletariat, in the vast majority, is dumb as a sack of bricks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Historically, socialist states Such as? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children) You're calling USSR or PRC "socialist"? WTF is this? A joke? I thought we're having a serious conversation here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) LOL, excellent jokes all around! Yes, both the USSR and PRC are typical examples of socialism Both USSR and PRC are prime examples of bog-standard totalitarian dictatorships. I have no clue where you're getting the "socialism" bits from. The fact that they said they are? Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy, because it's in their name? Public ownership is the principle aspect of both the former USSR’s economy and the PRC’s economy There's no public ownership in either. In USSR it was "friends of friends" (the people who we now call the Oligarchs) and in PRC you have a "dictator-approved capitalism" with companies being privately owned. I'll admit that I don't know enough about Cuba or Vietnam to discuss them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) My God, you seem to actually believe all this stuff... It's incredible to me! Are you from the US? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You being from the US makes a lot of sense considering how absolutely clueless you are to what really is going on in the countries you're talking about. I lived through the tail end of the USSR's "communism", my parents lived IN that. The reality of it is: USSR was a totalitarian dictatorship. There was nothing communist about it. Saying it was communist is just being extremely naive and ignorant. I mean, they themselves were always talking about how they're "on the road to reaching communism", they themselves didn't think of the USSR as communist. But even if we assume it was "not yet communist, but socialist" - it's still bullshit, because, again, it was a totalitarian dictatorship. And China? How can you see all the billionaires and CEOs of privately held companies and say "yeah, that's socialism where the workers own the means of production"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Packet@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Russians are stupid animals that have been brainwashed and can't think of their politics You might as well bring out the calipers already! It is very funny that you decided to stop arguing because cowbee is "delusional" and their belief stems from years and years of misinformation. They provided their sources while you only used wikipedia throughout this whole thing and personal anecdotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 year ago* In a state where there are neofascists like Trump, Mamdani is the left, face it. If you deny this, you're completely ignoring political pragmatism and confusing the historical left with their actual political left. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Left and right are relative to the actual political spectrum of the subject. There are different approaches to anticapitalism, centrist on the left-wing wants to implement social politics to improve welfare, this doesn't make it socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Your notion is a very post modernist ideology of absolute relativism, which is an idealist unscientific notion. Socialism starts at anti-capitalism. Anything pro-capitalist is not left wing because everything falls under liberalism which is not a left wing ideology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml [S] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Your notion is a very post modernist ideology of absolute relativism, which is an idealist unscientific notion. Socialism starts at anti-capitalism. Anything pro-capitalist is not left wing because everything falls under liberalism which is not a left wing ideology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net -9 points 1 year ago That's not what I wrote but hey, nice sofism here. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -12 points 1 year ago* (2 children) And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. The right wing starts at fascism. Or so it has evolved to. Vote against fascism next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. Anything but enthusiastic complicity with genocide and capitulation to republicans is "why trump won" according to the wing that would rather have trump win than tell netanyahu no ever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago Trump won with a sliver of majority support in a handful of states because of electoral college fuckery. Every state he lost could have voted against him 10 times harder and he still would have won. The swing votes he won in those few states were people fundamentally worried about the same things we are. Childcare, healthcare, cost of living, and keeping their jobs. They had two choices, a man who had a plan, and a woman who said "look how not that guy I am!" Trump won because he's mastered the grift and the Democrats dropped the fucking ball, again. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago And this take is why Trump won. Congrats. Anything but enthusiastic complicity with genocide and capitulation to republicans is "why trump won" according to the wing that would rather have trump win than tell netanyahu no ever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago Trump won with a sliver of majority support in a handful of states because of electoral college fuckery. Every state he lost could have voted against him 10 times harder and he still would have won. The swing votes he won in those few states were people fundamentally worried about the same things we are. Childcare, healthcare, cost of living, and keeping their jobs. They had two choices, a man who had a plan, and a woman who said "look how not that guy I am!" Trump won because he's mastered the grift and the Democrats dropped the fucking ball, again. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cruel@programming.dev -12 points 1 year ago Anti-capitalists working on socialist reforms are right-wing, and you oppose them? You guys are truly destined for irrelevancy. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago You have two examples of non-quisling democrats, and one isn't even a democrat. permalink fedilink source parent