you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From a tech POV, that makes a lot of sense. Use AI to find the needle in the haystack. Then let a person validate. That's probably one of the better uses for it. Although I don't love AI for any of the broad reasons to not like AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wasn't AI decent at writing code, but bad at review and modifying it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Maybe before. But it's gotten pretty damn good at detecting anomalies and issues. And every time a human QA validates the info, it gets better.

    I'd still leave it to a human to fix the code though. I suspect that letting AI write the code would make it unworkable for people in the future. But maybe it can write code in a straightforward way to be managed. I don't know. It's advancing pretty fast.

  • source
  • parent