119
Almost 100,000 young men flee Ukraine in two months (www.telegraph.co.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
229 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago (18 children)

They currently have all of Donetsk and Luhansk, and are gradually encircling Kiev's forces in the other 2 oblasts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    Such mad gains for over a million casualties

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    And Ukraine is stalling the inevitable, when all of this could have been avoided had peace talks not been sabotaged months into the war by the US and UK.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    lol they weren’t sabotaged.

    Peace talks after being invaded saying give us your land and we will stop hitting you are not peace talks. It would spur them on to do the same to other nations around Ukraine.

    You really need to learn how to spot propaganda.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    They were sabotaged. Ukraine was ready to make concessions, but the UK and US stepped in and said no. These were absolutely peace talks, as they would have ended the conflict.

    I know full-well how to spot propaganda, anything trying to convince someone of something is propaganda. Reading through bias and analyzing the source facts is necessary.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)

    Ukraine absolutely was not. They were never going to let Russia just invade them and take land. That’s a fallacy.

    They may have done in 2014 under a pro-Russia government when they weren’t prepared but this time they were.

    There is zero evidence of the peace talks nor of Us and UK sabotaging them or telling them to not accept. That is disinformation.

    Russia has not sued for peace. Any time they have approached potential talks especially with the Orangutan, Russia have attacked harder both pre and post “negotiations”.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    It isn't disinformation, it's proven fact. You can't just say reality doesn't exist and that Russia is going to turn around while they are winning, life is not a marvel movie.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I didn’t say they would. I said they should.

    What has a marvel movie got to do with anything? Superheroes aren’t real.

    While we are posting links. Here. https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/us-and-boris-johnson-forced-ukraine-not-to-sign-the-peace-deal-in-istanbul/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Russia isn't going to do whatever you personally want them to, especially when they are on track to get all of their stated goals accomplished. "Should" doesn't mean anything.

    Further, more sources on the west sabotaging peace talks:

    Linking a right-wing website trying to depict everything as kremlin propaganda doesn't overtake the facts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Wait, my link was right wing?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Yes, it's a pro-EU, pro-NATO source.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    And that’s right wing to you is it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Definitionally, yes. The EU and NATO are right-wing, imperialist coalitions that expropriate vast sums of wealth from the global south. All of them are dictatorships of capital.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Lot of words there. And if I told you Russia was the right wing and the EU was the left, how would that alter your world view?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It wouldn't. Russia is right wing, and so is the EU.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ok yeah I walked in to that one. Everything will be right wing to a full on communist. Curious though, what is China? They’ve got to be centre considering they’re essentially a capitalist-communist hybrid.

    I was meaning more what we would typically refer to as “right” wing being the parties in charge ie Trump, Putin, Orban etc. The EU for the most part is considered “left”. An economic and political union trying to do good by all its members, free movement, free trade, free market, rules and regulations, legislations and protections for its people and the rule of law etc. it has its faults sure but it is quite social leaning.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    China is socialist, the large firms and key industries are publicly owned, and the working class is in control. It's left wing. They have markets, but that doesn't make them a "hybrid," it just means they are at the developing stage of socialism.

    The EU is a cabal of imperialist countries. All of the niceties in the EU are founded primarily off the backs of exploiting the global south. Taking a firm stance against imperialism requires that the EU essentially give up its super-profits.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent