In case you want a woman's view of this stuff:

I think (at least for me & other women I've asked) looks work differently for women, it's a primary filter, like you have to look good enough, but not a scale - better looking than "good enough" doesn't make a guy more attractive to me, it's a yes or no on looks only. So it's not that I don't care, exactly, but there is not any man on earth who is so good looking I would want him because of his looks (I might want to look at him, same as I like looking at beautiful women, but looks don't cause me to be attracted to someone). And there are some who are so unattractive physically to me that they would never dig out of the "no", it's a scumbag brain deep illogical screening.

Height, as long as not much shorter than me, it doesn't matter. Weight, as long as not too fat (and honestly weight is probably the one criteria I can change mind on - fat and active is A-OK, my immediate knee jerk reaction can be overriden, and no guy has ever been too skinny, I have such nice memories of one guy who was like 6'5" and 140lb, when I was 5'9" and 115lb, it was like two skeletons, lol but he was so hot in so many ways not related to looks). Skin color, eye color, hair texture, bald, I don't care, those are not factors. Overall build and features yes, but nothing outrageous, average is good looking if the guy is good in other ways (considerate, thoughtful, competent at something, good lover, funny not in a mean way, there are so many not physical qualities that are attractive).

It's my understanding that guys are more like - better looking is more attractive, and that it's weighted heavier - so a lady who was better looking could be attractive with fewer of the other good qualities, and also that a lady who did not at first be so physically attractive to you could become so if she was awesome in other ways, that she could climb out of the immediate "no" and into the "yes". That doesn't happen for me - I can like those guys so much but won't want them.