196
Power bricks and wall warts for EU market must include detachable USB-C cables by 2028 — New legislation also adds power rating labels for cables (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/hardware@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I just wish they wouldn't have chosen such a small, fragile connector. They need to mandate that all USB C sockets are to be on a user replaceable module. It's a real pain in the ass to solder the high speed ones because they have a second row of pins underneath the connector.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Honestly I'd love a backwards/forwards-compatible USB-C with a socket recessed deep into a device and some mechanical locking mechanism for strain relief.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Something like this? I've used the ethernet version of these connectors and they are quite robust. They are rather pricey though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Yeah, kind of. I was thinking of something smaller, so that the cable would be compatible with standard ports. Basically the locking mechanism should be almost entirely on the port side, with the cable itself only having a passive "receptacle" for the locking pins, so that it fits into existing ports.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    IMHO as production of type-c connectors and ports ramped up, average quality went down. I've got oldish devices, among the first to introduce it, still making a perfect connection, and I've got newer ones that either always had poor connection or quickly developed it.

    Solder quality also makes a big difference, SMD ports are relatively easy to tear off the PCB.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I've had 2x+ more failures of C ports than Micro, and I've had 10x more micro devices for far longer (starting around 2009).

    Supposedly C is more durable, but that hasn't been my experience.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Yeah... I started using magnetic USB C adapters, because I fear that I accidentally damage them, or that I just wear it down. But those are a bit flacky...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The magnetic adapters are not complaint with the USB specifications. Lots of people have actually had their devices damaged by them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    True. As aren't USB-C extension cables.

    But, AFAIK, the issue is about the power rating. I buy these adapters that are rated for 120W, on devices that use 65W max, and hope for the best.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent