I know that Linux is more secure than Windows and normally doesn't need an antivirus, but know myself I'm gonna end up downloading something at some point from somewhere on the internet, and it would be good to be prepared. So, which antivirus would you recommend for Linux (Mint specifically) just to double up on security?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 year ago (12 children)

That is an old myth. There are less viruses for Linux because there are less users. But if you do things like install priated games, you have the same risk as on windows

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Thank you. I lived through the "Macs can't get viruses" bullshit. Try being a teacher in a school with 200 Macs and find out how real that claim is. Yeeeeesh lol... two weeks after fresh imaging and new semester starting 50% of the machines would be completely b0rked

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wine is not an emulator. It's not sandboxed either. If you can do it as a user, a program running in wine can do it too.

    There's nothing stopping a piece of malware from crawling your disk for sensitive information, or encrypting your files for ransom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you run it through something like bottles offer a bit of protection in that respect?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I wouldn't think so. Isn't bottles just an easier way to manage wine prefixes? If so, it doesn't do anything to hide your Linux system from the executable.

    Wine prefixes are not sandboxes. They are a way to separate the windows-level configuration for different programs (eg env vars, or drivers, etc).

    Wine is a translation layer between a compiled windows binary and your Linux syscalls/libraries/device drivers/etc, nothing more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Pirated ganes may contain linux viruses. No need for wine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Hard disagree - the point is a decade ago there wasn't enough Linux market share for bad actors to target Linux. Proton is a compatibility layer, which while technically being a sandbox, it isn't designed around security the way a browser sandbox is. It would not be hard for a virus embedded in a made-for-windows program to identify that it's actually a proton sandbox, then deploy a Linux-specific payload (assuming the malware designer gave it some forethought for that situation). Heck - there's plenty of viruses that do their work in scripting languages that don't care what OS you're running on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Brodie Robertson made a video about malware which pretends to be a pdf but is actually just an executable with a .pdf file extension. So if you double click it, you get pwnd. I think some desktop environments ask you for confirmation before running such thing but I would not count on it.

    So we even have an example of Linux specific malware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It shouldn't even be able to run it, because the x permission bit is missing. As far as I know binaries can't include icons on linux, so it would look different too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)