you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

When has “burger” or “steak” ever exclusively meant meat from an animal? This sounds like political corruption to me. Somebody is getting paid for turning this linguistic gaslighting into law.

A “burger” has always been a mince patty of any kind and a “steak” is a thick slab of something. The default assumption may be meat, but it has never been exclusive.

Edit
OP appears to have a serious problem accepting facts. It’s disappointing given the number of upvotes Voyager shows for them. I suppose nobody is perfect.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    I agree that burger has always been agnostic, but steak should really just be meat. Etymologically, it was always meat roasted on a stake. Similarly, bacon should just be a specific cut of pig meat, not turkey. Both of these are intentionally misleading marketing - with bacon it's even so when they're using different meats, let alone vegetables.

    Intentionally misleading people through advertising, in order to get more sales, is wrong.

    And don't get me started on American "biscuits" that are not cooked twice. They're savoury scones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    I mean... I kind of agree with you, but at the same time... Come on, the things have green packaging and "vegan" or "vegetarian" plastered all over the print. Not to mention they're being sold in separate sections in stores, not where the meat is.

    You need to really not be paying attention to get "tricked" by this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Yeah but you shouldn't have to be ever-vigilant against advertising. The government is supposed to regulate against businesses trying to trick people.

    Like the OP picture, the box says "cooks like ground beef", which is fine when you read it all, but the font colour is almost trying to hide "cooks like" such that at a glance you might only see "ground beef" and pick it by mistake. That's very borderline, at least.

    And while major supermarkets have vegetarian sections, smaller shops might not have such an obvious separation. You can't justify the packaging by where the product might be shelved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    the font colour is almost trying to hide “cooks like” such that at a glance you might only see “ground beef” and pick it by mistake

    Then regulate against that, not against calling them "burger patties", or something. I mean, the choice of the image is especially weird considering "burger patties" never mention meat specifically.

    And while major supermarkets have vegetarian sections, smaller shops might not have such an obvious separation

    They do, because you're not allowed to mix food products types in the EU. Meat MUST be separate from cheese, cheese MUST be separate from vegetables, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Yes but are there regulations on meat being separated from meat substitutes? Would we even want that? I think it could be better to have all the burgers in one place, so long as I can clearly tell beef from pork from veggie. And should the laws on packaging rely on compliance with other laws? It's the other way around - if the packaging is clear and appropriate, where things are placed doesn't matter.

    Cheese being separated from other things is more about hygeine. And even then, it isn't 100% - you can buy meatballs with cheese in them. Maybe there's some sterlisation requirement to make that okay? I don't know.

    I agree that burger should absolutely not be regulated as a meat only product. Just like how a pizza doesn't have to have plain tomato sauce.


    I did some digging to try and find a primary source, the actual vote is here (Ammendment 113, just search the page for "burger"). If you take burger and hamburger out of the list I'd have no issue.

    Hopefully when the EC (ie the competent lawyers, rather than populist representatives) take their pass at this they'll trim the list down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yes but are there regulations on meat being separated from meat substitutes?

    Yes, because meat substitutes are not meat, therefore they cannot be stored with meat.

    Would we even want that?

    We already have it.

    I think it could be better to have all the burgers in one place, so long as I can clearly tell beef from pork from veggie

    You already can. The veggies ones have big "veggie" letters on them.

    And should the laws on packaging rely on compliance with other laws? It’s the other way around - if the packaging is clear and appropriate, where things are placed doesn’t matter.

    The sanitary implications of meat stored with non-meat products has much farther reaching consequences than a random person going "ah, oops, I accidentally bought veggie burgers". Which, again, can only happen if they don't bother looking at the package they're grabbing.

    And even then, it isn’t 100% - you can buy meatballs with cheese in them. Maybe there’s some sterlisation requirement to make that okay? I don’t know.

    I'm not talking about ready-made meals or other meal types. I'm talking about "raw products". Things like "meatballs with cheese" are not a raw product and you won't find them in the meat fridge, they'll be with the frozen meals section - with the pizzas, fries, deep-fry veggies, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (5 children)

    You already can. The veggies ones have big “veggie” letters on them.

    No, not always. The OP photo is a good example of this, it doesn't have any word starting with "veg" on the front. What clues there are are white text on a light colour background or vice versa, meanwhile the "meat words" are black text. The meat words are visually promoted, while the vegetarian stuff is drawn in such a way as to encourage you to miss it.

    I’m not talking about ready-made meals or other meal types. I’m talking about “raw products”. Things like “meatballs with cheese” are not a raw product and you won’t find them in the meat fridge, they’ll be with the frozen meals section

    That's kind of what I was getting at, raw cheese is probably the main concern (because cheese itself is something that has to go off in a controlled way). Also, I do know supermarkets that sell raw meatballs with cheese in them in the fridge section. They're really good, although best eaten soon after purchase...

    I don't think there is actually any regulation (yet) that would stop a shop from putting meat products next to meat substitute products. Eg, putting meat free burgers in a burger section. And I don't think there should be.

    If you do know of an actual regulation, rather than just assuming there is one, I'd like to see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    The OP photo is a good example of this, it doesn’t have any word starting with “veg” on the front

    Oh, yeah, someone will see the massive "made from plants" and go: "huh, never heard of that animal".

    The meat words are visually promoted, while the vegetarian stuff is drawn in such a way as to encourage you to miss it.

    I have a horrible eyesight and still have zero problems seeing the white letters. I'm honestly confused as to why you people think this is some scheme to trick people into thinking that somehow the market illegally stored meat products in the non-meat section of the store.

    That’s kind of what I was getting at, raw cheese is probably the main concern (because cheese itself is something that has to go off in a controlled way). Also, I do know supermarkets that sell raw meatballs with cheese in them in the fridge section. They’re really good, although best eaten soon after purchase…

    Read what I wrote again...

    I don’t think there is actually any regulation (yet) that would stop a shop from putting meat products next to meat substitute products

    Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.

    EDIT

    I don’t think there is actually any regulation (...) And I don’t think there should be.

    Why? You don't like having better sanitary conditions and instead would prefer for various diseases, viruses and bacteria having an easier time spreading?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh, yeah, someone will see the massive “made from plants” and go: “huh, never heard of that animal”.

    "Made from plants" is light colour text on a white background. This is maybe slightly more obvious than white text on a light colour background, but it is still less prominent than any of the black text (which is all the "meat" words).

    And you're moving goalposts now. Before, you said they all said "veggie", and I replied that there was no visible word that said "veg" (ie the first part of the words "veggie", "vegetarian" or "vegan") on the parts of packaging show on display.

    You are arguing in bad faith.

    Read what I wrote again…

    What you said was quoted in my last comment. Here it is again, so you can't try and twist the argument:

    I’m not talking about ready-made meals or other meal types. I’m talking about “raw products”. Things like “meatballs with cheese” are not a raw product and you won’t find them in the meat fridge, they’ll be with the frozen meals section

    The meatballs with cheese I'm talking about are raw, fresh, and in the fridge section. They are not in the frozen section. They are next to other raw meats. The section is like a ready for oven raw food section, some packs have raw chicken, some have raw gammon steaks, this one I'm talking about has raw meatballs with raw cheese inside them.

    Regulation (EC) No 853/2004

    Lazy. You've just searched up a regulation with a relevant title, you haven't actually identified any part of the regulation that supports your argument. I haven't found one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Before, you said they all said “veggie”

    Yeah, my bad, I didn't expect someone see "plant" and fail to associate it with vegetarian diet.

    I should've said: "they are clearly marked in a way that attempts making it obvious that the product is not meat-based". But, again, I mistakenly assumed that this was obvious. Sorry about that!

    The meatballs with cheese I’m talking about are raw, fresh, and in the fridge section

    Define "fridge section", because I don't know what that means. Ice cream fridges? Meat fridges? Soft drinks fridges? Ready meal fridges?

    They are next to other raw meats

    Are they jumbled together with the raw meats?

    The section is like a ready for oven raw food section

    Ah, here you have the answer.

    Again, sorry for my assumptions. Unfortunately, my crystal ball is in the shop for maintenance, so I couldn't tell what kind of "meatball with cheese" product you were talking about, and assumed it's some form of frozen food that the markets I go to tend to have together with frozen pizzas, chicken nuggets, etc.,

    But the important part is this: it's in its own, separate section, which you said yourself.

    Lazy. You’ve just searched up a regulation with a relevant title, you haven’t actually identified any part of the regulation that supports your argument. I haven’t found one.

    Yeah, I can see that you're lazy, good for you for admitting that.

    You said that you wanted the regulation, I gave you the regulation, now you want the specific sections of the text. Remind me again, who's moving goalposts?

    The entire text pertains to how meat and meat products are supposed to be stored, how different elements and kinds of meat must be kept separate. To "quote the part that supports my argument" I'd need to quote the entire text...

    You didn't answer my question:

    I don’t think there is actually any regulation (…) And I don’t think there should be.

    Why? You don’t like having better sanitary conditions and instead would prefer for various diseases, viruses and bacteria having an easier time spreading?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You are very clearly arguing in bad faith, as evidenced by your bending over backwards to be contrarian and scarecrowing the argument you're fighting against. I'm not wasting any more time with you, which is sad, because this conversation started off well.

    And that regulation covers meat production and transport, I couldn't find anything in there relating to how meat products must be shelved in shops. Which is what we were talking about. My issue isn't that you didn't quote a specific part of the regulation, it's that the regulation you quoted doesn't seem to cover what you're arguing it does. And the fact that you're arguing this way pretty much confirms that you didn't even read the source you're quoting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    No. The below are vegan sausages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Show us an actual photo of that product and its actual packaging, not some random useless image from tesco's website.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Are they stored with the meat in the supermarket?

    Or would you rather find them with the rest of the vegan products, away from the meat isle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Was that a difficult question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It certainly was a ridiculous one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    OK, that's fair. If you're the kind of person to wander into the veggie section of the store, see something with "burger" on it, and think that it's meat, my question probably did seem confusing and ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Hypocrisy of vegans is breath taking.

    And so is ignorance. UK supermarkets typically place vegan products, including vegan sausages, in the same section as meat products.

    There are no ghettos for vegans here although judging from the hostility of vegans on Lemmy it may as well be better if they are kept away from the rest of the public.

    Now tell me once again that this product is not misleading 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    My goodness, mate, grow up! It's not about "ghettos", it's about the resolutions that even UK acknowledged (and, to my knowledge, hasn't rescinded) that require storing various categories of products (meat, diary, fish, etc) separately, to avoid contamination!

    Your vegan products may be in the same area of the store, but they won't be mixed with meat products, so you have to be fucking blind or stupid to "get tricked".

    And just FYI - I'm not vegan. Love me some good, crispy bacon with my scrambled eggs. But I'm also not a whiny idiot who sees a green "burger" box stored away from the meat products, turns off his brain, and thinks "ah, that must be meat!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago*

    What a fucking utter tosh, especially after I gave you an example of sausages.

    I am glad EU parliament recognised the issue and ignored "useful idiots", vegans or otherwise, trying to defend plant pulp industry 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What about steak mushrooms literally their name, cauliflower steak, or something with a wooden steak in it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    After I posted this comment I looked up the etymology, the word "steak" literally comes from food being roasted on a stake. So, really, that should be the deciding factor - most steak we eat isn't technically steak because it's cooked in other ways.

    Brazillian restaurants, the ones that come by with meat on a sword, should count as proper steak. Vegetables cooked in that manner could also be steak.

  • source
  • parent