▲ 818 ▼ Science! (reddthat.com) submitted 1 year ago by LadyButterfly@reddthat.com to c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 50 points 1 year ago (6 children) Just because something is obvious doesn't mean it's right. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (4 children) It wasn't until the 1900s that Principal Mathematica was written in order to derive fundamental axioms that can be used to derive all other mathematic principles. This is the book that people often partially joke about it being the first exhaustive proof that 1+1=2. I guess my point is also the compliment to your point. Even things that are right are not always obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think your point is actually "even things that are right and obvious are not always obviously right" or something like that. It's obvious to all of us that 1+1=2, and it is correct, but it isn't correct because it's obvious. It just happens to be both obvious and correct, but for very different reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Probably. Because I read what you said and agree. Maybe I said it badly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you mean Principia Mathematica? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Yeah. Auto correct or dyslexia. I like to blame autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear 4 points 1 year ago Obviously. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (4 children) It wasn't until the 1900s that Principal Mathematica was written in order to derive fundamental axioms that can be used to derive all other mathematic principles. This is the book that people often partially joke about it being the first exhaustive proof that 1+1=2. I guess my point is also the compliment to your point. Even things that are right are not always obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think your point is actually "even things that are right and obvious are not always obviously right" or something like that. It's obvious to all of us that 1+1=2, and it is correct, but it isn't correct because it's obvious. It just happens to be both obvious and correct, but for very different reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Probably. Because I read what you said and agree. Maybe I said it badly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you mean Principia Mathematica? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Yeah. Auto correct or dyslexia. I like to blame autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think your point is actually "even things that are right and obvious are not always obviously right" or something like that. It's obvious to all of us that 1+1=2, and it is correct, but it isn't correct because it's obvious. It just happens to be both obvious and correct, but for very different reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Probably. Because I read what you said and agree. Maybe I said it badly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Probably. Because I read what you said and agree. Maybe I said it badly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you mean Principia Mathematica? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Yeah. Auto correct or dyslexia. I like to blame autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Yeah. Auto correct or dyslexia. I like to blame autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent