I support the Palestinian resistance actively fighting for their own survival against genocide.
view the rest of the comments
This might come as a surprise to you, but Palestinians are Arab. Palestine is fighting a war of national liberation, they aren't a cabal of anti-semetic Nazis.
Being anti-zionist isn't being anti-semitic.
I support the right of Palestinian resistance, and have attacked antisemites on numerous occasions trying to use pro-Palestinian movements to further their agenda.
There's no evidence for systemic rape by Palestinian resistance. This is hasbara.
There is no footage that proves a systemic rape by Hamas. That is a proven lie
That's not to say Hamas hasn't raped people. This isn't condoning Hamas. But to imply that hamas is more guilty of rape or that it is part of their overall strategy is stupid and Israeli propaganda.
If I found evident that a Jewish person raped a Nazi, would that invalidate every Jewish person that fought back?
There’s no evidence for systemic rape by Palestinian resistance. This is hasbara.
There’s no evidence for systemic rape by Palestinian resistance. This is hasbara.
Nobody provided any evidence for systemic rape by Palestinian resistance. Goat is deliberately trying to reduce the Palestinian resistance to a gang of rapists in order to justify Israel's genocide as being against people that "deserve it."
That was the claim, yes, goat was equating Palestinian resistance to rape. Isolated cases of rape are awful, but it isn't pushed systemically. What goat is trying to do is justify the Zionist position that Palestinians "deserve it" because the resistance is "bad."
I never said it was a "Zionist plot." I said I support the resistance, and goat said that "rape isn't resistance," pretty clearly doing so to equate the national liberation movements in Palestine with rape. It capes for Israel.
What on Earth are you talking about? How am I a hypocrite?
Palestine has the right to defend itself.
It's amazing how goat is just here to get attention while saying it's to clear their name but only makes themselves look worse
Keeps posting their own ass, people call them out, posts ass more. Rinse and repeat.
(He is)
Source:

Not really. But I did actually skim it, and only posted that after I confirmed that it didn't show what you said it did.
It shows that Putin is a Nationalist, and then ends off with someone that was exiled in 1976 saying "trust me bro he really doesn't understand why the Soviet Union dissolved and really wants to bring it back, just trust me bro"
It's more of a snark space that the one you call snark spaces
Typical Liberal hellhole, they constantly hit left and demand everyone give in to fascism and then claim somehow everyone else is dividing the left
Punch left, cater to the right. Then wonder why the left doesn't trust them, as they vote in fascists with a better PR campaign.
It was transphobia to be more exact. @princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone gave a link to Goat being transphobic while claiming to stand for trans people. Goat edited the link after months, after she posted the evidence.
I find personally people who are happy to see Palestinians die generally arent to fond of any other minorities (shocker)
I never once said that communism is something magical that fixes all problems, nor have I placed religious significance on it. This giant wall of text is just you going on and on in flowery language without actually explaining how I fit the strawman you've made of me.
Communism, the ideology, is just the general organization towards collectivizing production and distribution. The process isn't magical, it isn't religious, but it has useful benefits and consistent practical knowledge developed by past communists and socialists to aid in reaching this end. That's what communism is. There's no magic utopia, and I have never said as such, nor have you explained how I misunderstand communism.
It's nice that you top off your comment with an ableist attack by calling me "simple-minded."
You didn't lay out anything, though, you waxxed poetic about a strawman. You're even doing it now, just because communism isn't magical doesn't mean I don't think it's important and necessary. You're outright stating in this doublespeak that if something isn't religious or magical, that it isn't worth anything at all, then you call what I do "doublethink."
Secondly, I have a busy life outside of Lemmy. I like to spend my online time talking about theory and geopolitics, but I don't even moderate any comms except Hexbear's c/theory which I only use to pin and unpin reading threads. You're speaking like a Marvel villian right now without stating anything of substance.
Is your point that communism is bad if communists ever make a mistake?
imaqtpie certainly talked about religion...
Having not read much theory, I have found your comments about communism and geopolitics helpful and insightful, thanks.
No problem, thank you so much!
If you want, I actually have an introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list, feel free to give it a look if you want to familiarize yourself more with Marxism-Leninism!
You mean the transphobic american nationalist is someone you hold as having well-thought out views?
In what way was it hilarious? imaqtpie made the argument that "communism is when you kill the sparrows," when no modern communist thinks that was a good move. They're arguing against ghosts, while you defend zionists and transphobes.
Nice, dehumanizing me, what a great thing to do.
You called me a "thing."
See, you do it again even when it's been pointed out.
This is amongst the most pathetic interactions i have ever seen.
Communism, globally.
Once all of production is collectivized, the basis of class ceases to exist, and thus the basis of the state erodes.
Communism isn't utopian, and greed isn't a matter of biology, but expressed to greater or lesser degrees depending on the mode of production.
The basis of the state is class society. Once class is abolished through collectivized production, the oppressive elements of society that form the state, ie police, millitaries, etc erode. Administration will continue to exist, as will collective decision making organs, etc, but this is not what Marxists recognize as the state.
Marxists define states and governments as two separate things, you should look into this before you ask this question
Communists as a whole use the original meanings of the terms and not the modern ones.
"Citing the fact that Russia has increasing support for socialism as proof of Russians having increased support for socialism is perfectly valid."
can you rephrase this sentence in your own words?
then
can you explain why he would say this?