I currently have to use Subtitles, kinda annoying. And I despise dubs since the voice acting is so bad, I mean like the emotions in the voice, its so emotionless in English.

I am a English speaker with some fluency in Cantonese and Mandarin.

How difficult is Japanese? Am I gonna waste a lot of time?

Also what's the best resource to learn?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Everything about the language is needlessly complicated.

I mean, there is no language that isn't needlessly complicated. At least Japanese doesn't have gendered nouns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Consider the needlessly complicated to be applied on top of a general baseline of needlessly complicated that applies to any language.

    While they don't have gendered nouns, they have something equally unnerving for the beginner learner. Their noun classes evolve mostly around the nature of shapes and sizes, which becomes an issue the moment you need to count anything. For which there are two systems, one of which stops at ten, and the other is highly irregular in its forms. And don't get me started on the calendar. English is relatively unsophisticated by comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago*

    For which there are two systems, one of which stops at ten, and the other is highly irregular in its forms.

    I think you mean Wago and Kango counting, in which case Kango isn't irregular at all. There are sound changes, but they almost all follow a handful of basic rules. Wago is plenty irregular, but it also stops at ten and is only used for a handful of things. It's messed up, sure, but not the end of the world.

    And don't get me started on the calendar.

    The calendar? Their months are literally just firstmonth, secondmonth, thirdmonth, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    I mean, I thought Japanese was super straightforward compared to English. I’ve been speaking English for three goddamn decades and I:

    • still occasionally flip my Rs and Ls when I’m going fast and being careless
    • have to pause a beat before saying “Canada” to make sure I don’t use the rhythm structure/emphasis pattern for “banana”
    • sometimes just get really lost when I make a complicated sentence and have to stop and try again
    • can barely remember that English speakers take pills, and not drink them (you don’t chew them, for fucks sake! Just say drink!)
    • fucking hate that OUGH has more readings than most kanji
    • realized a couple years into learning English, that English has twenty-six radicals, stacked horizontally, and they make a word, and that word may not be pronounced how the radicals suggest, and it’s best just to memorize 116,000 kanji-words (and you English speakers bitch about kanji so endlessly, not understanding the sheer absolute fucking monster you came from)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    can barely remember that English speakers take pills, and not drink them (you don’t chew them, for fucks sake! Just say drink!)

    In my mind drink is exclusively for liquids, which is why drinking a solid sounds weird to me. Because there's no chewing involved swallowing pills makes more sense than eating them, but I'll admit I don't know why "take" is the usual verb.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    The last point resonates with me! 😭 all other European languages are actually write-as-you-speak. Why, English, why???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Danish has entered the chat. They don't pronounce anything the way it's written either. And French consists of 80 percent silent letters or thereabouts. It's not just English in Europe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    I don’t know Danish, but French is at least consistent in what is pronounced and what is not. So seeing a word will tell you how to pronounce it even if it’s the first time you encounter it.

    Edit: I was proven wrong about French.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ils mangent - intelligent

    Same four letters at the end, not the same pronunciation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I would say, same prononciation different accent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    ... French is at least consistent in what is pronounced and what is not. ...

    I would say you're moving your own goalposts here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have been mulling it over since the previous post. I got taught that French was read-as-written and repeated it. But now, I realize there is more.

    Mangent is like rangent but not like gent - because mangent is a verb and is pronounced practically without the -nt. On the other hand intelligent is like gent, because it’s not a verb. The question is also obfuscated by nge being a different sound than ge and that intelligent and gent have the accent on the last syllable, while mangent and rangent have the accent on the one-to-last syllable.

    For a better example of the difference in pronunciation between verb and noun, mangent and tangent would be better and there is indeed a difference.

    Furthermore, (I think) tangent needs to have the accent on the last syllable because gent is a long sound here. While in mangent the last syllable is not long, therefore the accent recesses.

    My teachers lied to me and I blindly believed them. Sorry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • There is no need for an apology. Let's just blame the French and move on;)

    I think it is possible to develop a sense for the language. Knowing not to pronounce the third person plural present tense indicative ending, as it is pretty much always in company of an "ils" or "elles" is one of those senses you can develop. It just isn't the same as read as written. And I have a suspicion your teacher told you that white lie not to break your spirit. If you have endured the absolute mockery that English spelling makes of the alphabet, then it would be soul crushing to say: and here is how the French language takes the mockery to new (silent) heights. And we throw in a œ just for shits and giggles.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Great Vowel Shift. English writing was sensible in the early 14th century around the time of Chaucer, but then shit got out of whack speaking-wise and the writing system was never adjusted to reconcile the difference. So you can blame the Black Death I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment