Ok!

Liberals == moderates, not followers of human rights

Same people as King described 50 years ago

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice

Equality isn't really a liberal idea. Liberalism is primarily about individualism and free flow of capital, people here tend to be leftists that support socialism and are against capitalism.

Leftist has existed for a lot longer than that, this is absurd. There have been communists and anarchists in the US for centuries, there's nothing intrinsically European about the term.

it was commonly understood as a European word meaning something similar to liberal but more extreme and more locally focused within their respective countries.

uh what? Also, all the western trots in shambles right now 😆

So, you did not read it

Both sides of the aisle want to slaughter women and children in Southwest Asia and elsewhere, only one side is honest about their intentions.

You didn't even read the article

Weird way to admit you're illiterate if I'm being real. There's no way you come away with this opinion as it being insubstantial unless you 1) didn't read it or 2) did read it but was unable or unwilling to comprehend it.

liberalism's goal is to enslave the world or to blindly defend capitalism.

And that change definitely won't happen by people voting for "status quo" politicians.

Then you need to stop calling yourself a liberal, because you disagree with its core tenets.

I highly recommend reading Losurdo's Liberalism - A counter-history, if you want a full historical overview of what liberalism is.