you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 64 points 1 year ago (30 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [+] 24 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    No, it's not. Even more so if you like your artists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Buy their merch rather than feeding the beast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Even if that was ok, I'm sure people who pirate buy a ton of merch from all the artists they pirate, that's why all those artists get a ton of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'm sure that small to medium artists don't get fleeced by Spotify and get a ton of money from a service that almost everyone in the west is using. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Some more things I'm sure of include that Spotify exists for the artists and won't sneakily replace them with Suno-generated shit at first opportunity or fuck with people's legacy of holy playlists or make the interface more cumbersome to alter users' habits, or increase the price until the frogs start jumping out. It's allowed to exists through the graces of biggest publishing conglomerates whose C-suite and shareholders get the lion's share. Fuck fucking Spotify.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'm sure they are on Spotify (which is shitty anyway) and other streaming services by choice. And if you are against streaming services, feel free to buy their albums.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I use bandcamp to throw some cash at them, it's a fair offer and ok price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    It's probably the most popular music streaming service at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Sure, for the morally bankrupt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Who is any better? Literally all are paying pennies to the artist per stream.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tidal pays more than 3x what Spotify pays. Qobuz pays like 5-6x.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Although better, still very little in comparison to bandcamp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Sure, that's true, though if you allow streams on Bandcamp, those pay $0, so in terms of "try before you buy", any streaming service is better. It's only if you actually sell an album on band camp (or AmpWall, a smaller indie service that does a lot of the same stuff) that you'd get paid, as an artist.

    I say this as a musician who has put out several albums both independently and with a label.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tidal doesn't host far-right mouthpieces, offers much higher quality streams, and pays the artists far, far more per play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Yeah. Just started my self hosting journey a few months ago, looking to replace Spotify at some point. I got a NAS with Jellyfin set up, my next step is replacing Google photos with Immich probably.

    I do appreciate Spotify will be adding lossless music soon, but they have so many other issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Mostly for random song discovery considering my previously liked songs, I regularly download/obtain those songs I like for offline reproduction and preservation... online stuff has short lifes

  • source
  • parent