The next time someone tells you the youth aren’t engaged enough in politics, just point them to Nepal.

According to multiple reports, the youth of the South Asian nation managed to oust the existing government following an attempted ban of major social media platforms and took to Discord to hold an impromptu convention to elect an interim prime minister.

The organizing appears to have worked. On Friday, the military accepted the recommendation of the protest group and named Karki the interim prime minister. Karki, who accepted the role, is expected to pick a new cabinet and eventually hold elections. According to the Times, that is expected to happen within the next six months or so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 1 year ago (15 children)

The organizing appears to have worked. On Friday, the military accepted the recommendation of the protest group and named Karki the interim prime minister.

If only this is how it could go down in the US. Sigh…

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Unfortunately, when it happens here its going to be a long, awful, drawn out, bloody conflict.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The No Kings protests demonstrated, if literally nothing else, that record-breaking groups of people across the country can remain mostly peaceful with extremely high underlying emotions churning.

    This administration will be the downfall of the system and people will barely have to lift a finger. When the US economy inevitably crashes, people's comfort will be in jeopardy - mass bloodshed will not restore that. This isn't the 1800s, we literally are too numerous and our systems are too fragile to support and sustain a massive, drawn-out civil war.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I wonder what the US military would do if the current administration's head was cut off quickly enough so no significant orders went out to the military from them. Marshal law then eventually an election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Under current law, you would need to kill 22 people before replacements can be appointed. Possibly less if some of them are not constitutionally eligible to be president; but if it ever got to that point, I suspect we would ignore that provision.

    Pulling this off is made even more difficult by both the heightened security given to everyone in the line of succession; and the fact that under our continuity of government plans, those people are deliberately never all in the same place at the same time.

    Anything that could accomplish a full decapitation strike would likely require marshall law anyway, and would likely make the conditions for an election difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments