you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So the definition in the link you gave does not mention the word undesirable or reference groups of people who the nazis considered undesirable.

Edit: well the Merriam definition is a bit closer to the term, as in its more dehumanizing and harsher. I don't really think it's enough to be equivalent. I also think who you target with the word is really what makes you a nazi, and not just using it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Dictionary definitions are almost completely useless for historical/social analysis. It's much more accurate to examine etymology and historical usage. The history of this term is very very very clearly fascist especially in USA. The people who commonly use this term are fash-adjacent at best even if they don't realize it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    No, it’s about ethics in gaming journalism!

    GTFO, sealion. If you’re still defending this hours later, you’re trolling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    People are still responding to me. So yes, I will reply. I dont understand the reference to gaming journalism?

    Can't I also say the same thing about you. Why are you responding hours later, are you trolling right now?

    And although you might have a point with not wanting to have dehumanizing language in the community, it doesn't mean he isn't wrong with his dictionary definition.

  • source
  • parent