you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What you said is true but also irrelevant to the discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Not really. Biking is a better alternative to both of the options discussed above.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    No? Though if someone wants to transport a few to me I’d be happy to try fixing them up. But since they’re on the other side of the planet it’s probably not worthwhile.

    If you’re trying to say biking creates waste, the problem is 100x greater with cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    The latter.

    Unless you like tire, breaks, bolts, chains, springs, etc. residue everywhere, keep on bike wasting. I already said what I wanted to say 🧵.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Trains are great but they also produce waste. Every transportation tech does.

    Both are miles better than cars, that’s the bottom line. And bikes make trains a lot more usable here in the US since the stations tend to be quite spread out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment