The real question for me is.

We gonna get to see a again Bobbie Draper make run at nearly unstoppable dreadnought with a antimatter bomb?

It's great that the series so far ended right before the time jump in the books.

The time jump is the entire reason the TV series ended at that point, IIRC

Most people don't follow the whole legal machinations of how shows are financed and only care about the show.

Personally I don't care what they do. I just hope they have good stories and continue with the hard sci-fi fidelity (aka no pew-pew)

Someone should probably explain what TV is so that everyone is at the same level.

The books are genuinely fantastic, highly recommend.

Me too! Mass Effect is an all time fav. So stoked.

[Book Spoilers]

It's great that the series so far ended right before the time jump in the books. It's not a thirty year gap (hopefully), but they'll be able to keep what cast members are able to return without having to explain the aging between seasons (or just ignoring it like Stranger Things).

I'm excited for the game, and I'm going to read all the books.

Does this mean we can finally get a 4K UHD Blu-ray release‽

Alcom's rights were always going to expire, and no one had ever hinted that there was going to be a renewal, AFAIK. This is a necessary step, but not a surprising one.

I do wonder if it is something where the off-camera creatives could come back to spin the final three seasons of The Expanse up and then segue into The Captive's War. Not that they're the same setting (we assume), but we at least know there are people who can do a well-liked adaptation of JSAC books.

That plus the game, rights reverting back… not an official announcement but indications that the license is well alive and someone could very much capitalise on that to add one more season.

So you didn't read that?

More than five years after The Expanse aired its series finale, the acclaimed sci-fi show is officially returning with a huge new release (literally) celebrating its complete television run. Titan Books has announced The Expanse: The Complete Visual History, a massive 320-page hardcover retrospective scheduled to release in the US/UK on August 17, 2027. Written by Mike Avila, the book is being billed as a "comprehensive behind-the-scenes look" at all six seasons of the television series.

🎉🎉🎉

It’s on IMDB as well so it looks solid ❤️

Right? They better not tease me.

Really??! That would be awesome !!!

The term I'm aiming for is for the concept of Newton's 3rd law, not the book.

Yea, but language is about communication, not absolutely precision.

This isn't a scientific paper, this characters and naritive trying to express ideas, and there clarity of intent and idea is more important than scientific rigour.

Force is the effect, gravity is the cause. Gravity, thrust, and spin accelerate us or other objects and it's our interaction other objects that we feel. So "thrust gravity" is taking two concepts that work similarly and mashing them together. Like, if someone called an electric stove "electric gas", that is just the two things used to create heat, but nothing about the heat itself. It's a misuse of the terms.

Yeah, but the whole point is that the effect felt is the 3rd law in action - one thing pushes against another thing, and that thing pushes back. While gravity can cause that, it's not gravity itself, right? If I catch a ball that's in motion, it's the force I apply to it that stops it, not gravity. Same thing for ships in thrust, or spinning stations. It's all 3rd law in action, not just different versions of gravity.

not a bad word, problem is i hear that, and for some reason i think potential energy, not a gravity like effect! How about gravnertia? Inertia which causes a gravity like effect

Having played one mission in their beta it is similar to ME2/3 but at least in that one mission they really used the dynamics of space/mag boots well.

Depends what the author cares about, I guess?

You know what the "g" stands for right? XD

It isn't different. Thrust gravity and t-grav are both made up names for a concept that was accurately described in the book. So they are both equally accurate since there is nothing scientific about a made up name.