[–] 3 points 1 year ago

I left work as a CTO, after 7 years, to become a coder again. Pay plummeted, but I'm happier and I feel like I actually contribute with something valuable. Mostly, I love learning new tech things, which I was too distanced from as a manager. If I were to leave the high paced tech life, my choice would not be to become a technical socialist/idealist, which is my take on the article; I would probably try something else, like gardener or electrician.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I fundamentally love tech, particularly scientific computing. However, most products in that space are basically languishing since the 90s. Incremental improvements are well and good, but 3-4 decades without any meaningful paradigm shifts seems like laziness.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    This is for short-lived cloud-allocated (virtual) machines which have an IPv4 address but not necessarily a DNS presence. When there are more than a handful of machines, name management becomes its own unique pain; often, the domain names of such a machine are an opaque string of numbers under some subdomain, and managing the name is not different from managing the raw IP address instead. Similarly, for the case of many machines all serving a wildcard (e.g. a parking page) allocating a single IP-address certificate might be preferable to copying the wildcard certificate to each machine.

    As you point out, though, SSH exists and has accumulated several decades of key-management theory. Using HTTPS instead of SSH for two machines with one owner is definitely not what I would do. I've worked at all scales from homelabs to Google and I can't imagine using IP-address certificates for any of it.

    Now, with all of that said, if Let's Encrypt were available over e.g. Yggdrasil then there would be a use-case for giving certificates directly to IPv6 addresses and extending PKI to the entire Yggdrasil VPN. That seems like a stretch though.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I think literally just the "nominal fee" for the domain name. Sometimes you host a microservice or something on a laptop on your lan and don't feel like throwing it on a domain or even subdomain, but you want/need https . The applications seem limited indeed

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    I understand all the tech, except why I, as a home user, might want this. For that matter, what's in it for a business user?

    I've hosted a dozen different servers from home. FTP, HTTPS, SSH, the usual. What's the advantage of giving up the flexibility of my DNS name? I might save a few bucks a year with Namecheap?

    Not saying this is dumb or completely useless, just not seeing much application.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›