Yeah youre right, I removed it.

Theyve been spying for 15 years. They can control you too. Why do you think they wanted electric steering and to get rid of throttle cables and "safe" automatic braking? Control. They can lock your doors and drive you anywhere, they can slam on your brakes as a semi truck is behind you if they deem you a threat to dear Leader.

The power they have now to get rid of undesireables , and sweep it all under the rug is a fascists dream.

This warning is like 10 years late.

If I ever going to get a car, it's going to be a used one from around 2005.

Wait until you find out that other car's smart features could be used to spy on you. All those Tesla and Waymo cameras just ripe for the picking.

A big surveillance hive swarm of vehicles.

Cars should not connect to the internet. Or at minimum have an easy way to physically disable the internet (ex: a physical off switch for the modem).

Open-source car! Take a seat, press the buttons! Get the pro version to make it actionable so you can move!

huh, ðnx🙇

https://techxplore.com/news/2026-02-car-sensors-track.html

TPMS sensors are usually RFID, and I believe some new cars are using BLE. Those are traceable signals if they aren't anonymized in any way.

If it is well structured from a legal point, those would be in a closed source binary plug-in

but that's mostly internal.
Unless Typotyper is saying 🚗 🖥️ are broadcasting actually carlogs outloud.
I know plenty of folks that don't install their own 🚗 🖥️ w/analog info.

Maybe the tire pressure sensors?

ð wat now?
you mean tire tracks?

I wonder if the "pro" features are in the released source code or not.

It can also track a car tires' unique Bluetooth signal. Doesn't even need to visually see the license plate.

Edit link for tech https://techxplore.com/news/2026-02-car-sensors-track.html

So if what tiktok is doing is legal then why did they settle and change their policy instead of going to trial?

My question about physical content distributed outside a school is just a question about whether showing this content to children is morally acceptable.

I actually didn't realize this case was mostly about kids 13 and older. So some of my arguments may seem a little extreme. But if tiktok tells parents that they offer a restricted version of the app, for little kids, that doesn't include violent and sexual content, and then they come back and say that it's not working as intended and little kids are still seeing this content then that's a problem.

For video games it would be like if a video game had a rating saying it was good for children of all ages and then actually it had sexual scenes and violence.

If you had to make a fictional scenario to try to get your point, then it's not an actual argument. Violent contents are very much common-place. Video games has a lot of violent contents, and to this date, there has been zero evidence that video games causes real issues at mass scale. As for sexual content, that's unavoidable given so much emphasis on sex by society, that you'd literally have to address marketing to solve it and to change culture at a mass scale as well. It's on the parents at the end of the day. Besides, again, you don't have evidence chat control is effective.

1. If it's open-source you can probably run it anyway, but
2. Open-source ≠ free

nft profile picture and Claude contribitions

Just curious if you'd be okay with someone standing outside of school waiting for students to leave, handing out sexual and violent pictures to eight year olds?

Runs offline, open-source, costs $25 to use for 30 days ?

Lol

That's on the parents' job. All you're enabling is shutting down of First Amendment, increased unnecessary surveillance, etc. And if there is pornography, then it should be reported and removed anyway.

That's what happens when you're looking for a needle in a haystack.

But the case against Tik Tok isn't just that it's addictive. The content they suggest to children is sexual and violent.