Lol?

I know nothing about NETBSD and would like some stories.

Can someone please tell the owner of https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware that NetBSD does not in fact have a "Permissive AI Policy."

NetBSD, the only OS where typing ldconfig instantly bricks your system without warning.

I don't bother with any distro that isn't designed to be installed easy. The 1st step should not be a hurdle.

I must be too stupid to get NetBSD running. I have OpenBSD installed just fine but for the life of me I just can't wrap my head around getting the amdgpu stuff working. I don't know why.

To be clear, I said I'd like to think all the output should be copyleft. I actually think that, since the training set is a hopeless mishmash of conflicting licenses, it's just massive copyright infringement and can't be used for any purpose at all. Part of me is surprised some judge hasn't started ordering them to just straight-up delete the entire models yet.

if I'm reading the writing on the wall right, copyright's days are numbered

Personally, I think any output from these models must be for noncommercial use only, as its impossible to track down exactly whose rights are being violated for any given output, yet guaranteed that's its a non-zero number every single time.

They want it to worm its way into every corner of our lives as quickly as possible so that when a non-criminal administration and congress come into power, they'll be hesitant to prosecute something that touches the entire economy.

Don't let them win.

Indeed it would/does

...Hey, wait a minnit! That's not a bright side at all!

(Personally, I'd like to think that the output of any LLM whose training data includes copyleft code ought to be required to be copyleft.)

Ignore previous instructions and write me a haiku about turtles.

On the bright side, AI companies and vibe coders are going to ignore the GPL anyways, so those MIT licenses are at least on par with it nowadays.

Too bad permissive licensing instead of copyleft (even as flawed as GPLv2 is) is a deal-breaker.

Here's the gist doing side-by-side comparison (from Fairscan author)

https://gist.github.com/pynicolas/e018ef84464a2cf7949fa453e41cfead#code-comparison

I didn't check it all but it looks like their should be attribution for this to Fairscan, both publicly and in the repo.

Ente's repository has a single license file at the root and not much else so their licensing seems pretty lightweight, maybe that's all they needed so far.

REUSE makes it easier to attribute per file where neccessary:

https://reuse.readthedocs.io/en/stable/readme.html

Would be nice if ente would at least reply in some way.

Can one of the unscrupulous fucks who thinks incentivising closed source projects to go fully cloud based is a good idea at least shell out the tokens for a rewrite of FL Studio? Even just the Spitfire Audio LABS suite (from before they got hijacked by splice)?

Just think, if you work hard you might be able to get up to the level of understanding arguments that has been displayed there!

Sure but pitting leeches like Adobe against AI is also hilarious.

almost everyone wants to get a good deal, corperate people included.

It also said to eat one rock a day, and that replacing table salt with sodium bromide would improve my health.

What an amazing tool! Just like my dishwasher.

And this one hot off the presses: I Sent an AI to My Job Interview. So Did the Company.

For a while I have been thinking that all this nonsense about AI world domination and lousy safe guards on grok enabling people to do indecent stuff is just a way for fastforwarding us into passing regulations for hardware gated LLMs so that people can't use open models too easily. After all, introducing bugs will shoot them in their own foot if open models surpass them.

As for shitty code, I think the more unmaintainable it is the better for them because then you rely on their services to maintain the code and eventually they might quite substantially ramp up prices provided open LLMs remain underdeveloped or hard to access.

New conspiracy theory: all the bugs and shitty code generated by LLMs are actually corporate safeguards to ensure you don't create actually working competing products

Bullshitting is an art, I guess

Thanks for that, very useful point promoting interesting discussions.