[–] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I agree a half finished game isn't what OP is looking for, and a lot of the gameplay (especially later) revolves around finding your way through what are effectively mazes.

I play it one handed though. It's turn based combat and when out of combat you just put your finger on the screen and it walks towards it? I didn't even know a d-pad option existed 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    I wonder if mobile version of Cataclysm-DDA is open-sourced, like the desktop one. It is probably the most mechanically complex zombie-survival roguelike you can find

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    Not entirely and with absolute certainty, but more than any proprietary software in general. The more eyes on it the better.

    At the end of the day, you have to trust someone and a few black boxes in between as soon as you connect to the internet. So if there's something I'd really rather not let out into the world, it's either on an airgapped encrypted system or a piece of paper hidden where my keys get lost.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Mindustry, its open source, free, has campaign and multiplayer mode, also available on pc. You can even support devs by buying steam version of the game

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    If there is a healty sized developer group contributing. I tend to just install.

    If there's just single developer, not much history and mayde AI involved, I'll just skip the software.

    I don't have time to review the code and I don't think the developer wants me to feed the code to AI.

    If AI is one of the developers and already involved, AI review is an option, if I really need to run it.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Can you prove that there is a backdoor?

    I didn't say there is, I only ask for proofing your point. Remember: Not able to find anything is not the proof of absence. You can only proof something you can find. All I am saying is, if even Linux Kernel ALMOST got hid by a backdoor that was extremely sophisticated, it could happen to Ghidra as well. I'm not saying Ghidra is unsecure or anything like that.

    if China, Russia, NK or any other nation state could find a backdoor

    Then they would most likely use it to their advantage without telling anyone. Shaming a nation is not as lucrative like abusing a backdoor.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    Even if we take your definitions, they are still conflicting.

    Attacking humans means developing malware.

    Defending capital means protecting that capital from others malware.

    If either of them do their job too well, the other will be failed. That is by definition conflicting.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

    Go to any cyber security conference. Check out the CTF teams, Ghidra is used everywhere.

    Can you prove that there is a backdoor? Remember that it is freely available, and if China, Russia, NK or any other nation state could find a backdoor, they would be shouting it from the rooftops to shame the US.

    I dont doubt that the NSA could have seeded a backdoor in an open source project, but I very much doubt they would sign their name to it...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Ghidra is used by the best and brightest malware inspectors.

    Can you prove your claim?

    If it was backdoored, it would have been discovered almost immediately.

    That's the hope. Reality is, these things still happen. Remember that even the extremely secure Linux Kernel was almost, if it was not discovered accidentally and looked into it, hit bey huge backdoor. What makes you so sure that Ghidra developers and inspectors is on the same level?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›