[–] 7 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

In case it's not obvious, this is a fishy source. Per Wikipedia's own guidelines:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including examples of outright fabrication. Editors consider the New York Post more reliable before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department. A 2024 RfC concluded that the New York Post is marginally reliable for entertainment coverage; see below. This consensus does not apply to the broadsheet publication of the same name, that existed from 1801–1942.

It is original reporting, at least.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Ok, so correct me if I'm wrong, but usually the reason you do this is because the cost to produce this benefit is lower than the price you usually sell it for, so you can inflate the claimed value of the benefit, both to appeal to candidates and to write it off on your taxes. But at the moment tokens are usually sold way below cost (i.e. the companies are not profitable), so why the fuck would any company do this? Are they this short on cash now?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    You forward 16 prompts, what do you get?
    Another day older, and deeper in debt.
    Saint Peter (Thiel) don't you call me, cause I can't go
    I owe my soul to the AI store

  • source
  • [–] [S] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I think it's actually maybe a bridge too far even for them - it reminds me of this scene in Bowling for Columbine where the brother of Oklahoma City bombing accomplice Terry Nichols reluctantly concedes that there should be some limits to the right to bear arms.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Ya this is kind if a unique situation and I went through something similar having had twins in NICU, they bill everything under your childs name and if that baby was in there for several weeks you can really run up a huge bill. It creates a huge mess of paperwork afterwards. This seems to be an instance of a foreign insurance company never having had this happen before, hopefully they update their policies to have this covered by default.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›