▲ 23 ▼ Polymarket Decides Incentivizing a Nuclear Detonation Might Be a Bad Idea (gizmodo.com) submitted 8 months ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.ml 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] astraeus@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) I think it's actually maybe a bridge too far even for them - it reminds me of this scene in Bowling for Columbine where the brother of Oklahoma City bombing accomplice Terry Nichols reluctantly concedes that there should be some limits to the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago Apparently nuclear weapons are a constitutionally guaranteed right! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) I think it's actually maybe a bridge too far even for them - it reminds me of this scene in Bowling for Columbine where the brother of Oklahoma City bombing accomplice Terry Nichols reluctantly concedes that there should be some limits to the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago Apparently nuclear weapons are a constitutionally guaranteed right! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago Apparently nuclear weapons are a constitutionally guaranteed right! permalink fedilink source parent