[–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

From what I've heard, the INDX addon for the Core One has an extremely high failure rate compared to the Snapmaker U1. I was told by people very close to the project that it's somewhere on the order of 80% because it uses a single actuator for everything, including retraction.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • If you've found your way to Lemmy you likely care enough about not being exploited by evil companies to make a better choice than Bambu. Wouldn't sweat the learning curve too much with whatever system you choose. There are great resources to help and the 3d printing community is just awesome. It's a hobby that you'll never feel alone in.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Specific issues? I've already mentioned my printer is out of commision due to a bad clog, filament has spewed out to cover the whole nozzle. I can't get the nozzle out since it's trapped in a solid chunk of plastic.

    The Prusa Core One does not have "twice the price for the same features", it's about a couple hundred dollars more than the equivalent Bambu for: European manufacturing, immense repairability (not based on "feelings", they have the option to ship the printer as a DIY kit so that you can know each part inside and out, and time and time again Prusa has allowed users of upgrade to the next version), reputation for reliability (I know friends who have been using a Prusa for the past decade that are still going strong!), and an awesome attitude to the community.

    And yes, Elegoo has a better value printer! So why position Bambu as the "affordable" option, if it has less features (no enclosure, no CoreXY) compared to the Elegoo CC (and others, you have Qidi doing heated bed chamber for a great value), while not being as reliable/repairable as a Prusa? Plus them being awful to FOSS projects and closing down on their software is generally bad. Obviously, don't contribute to e-waste and bin your printer, I haven't, but for newbies, I would strongly advise against Bambu.

    Yes, Prusa has made bedslingers for long time, but the Core One has been out for a while now, and it's recently received the optional INDX upgrade for multi-toolhead. Prusa isn't falling behind, they are still doing very cool stuff and innovating, not to mention everything is STILL upgradeable despite becoming CoreXY, and that is an achievement! (e.g. you can upgrade a MK4S to a Core One + INDX if you wanted too)

    It's a lie to say that Prusa is not innovating, because they really are :D

    They have also contributed a lot to the community, the opposite of which is true for Bambu.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago*

    You have not addressed the main points against Bambu:

    • attempting to take down small FOSS projects (which, by the way, are not violating any of Bambu's licenses, Bambu Studio is open-source and the fork is not "abusing their services")
    • the existence of much better values options (e.g. Elegoo CC, and many of Qidi's machines are good too)
    • the locked down software ecosystem, I have bought the printer and have happily used OrcaSlicer for a while, why should it be blocked via software patch? What reasoning is there to block third party hardware (literally just a screen attachment for the P1 series, "security" my ass) aside from screwing with everybody? Bambu cannot be trusted to keep their promises
    • the "just works" excuse isn't good enough, since Bambu machines do have reliability issues. Maybe it's because I live in a more humid climate, but I have experienced as many issues on the A1 as other nom-Bambu printers
    • Prusa machines are very well regarded in terms of support and repairability, that is one of their key strengths and you are dismissing that completely

    And instead, you are focusing on the higher prices of Prusa machines (while ignoring that higher end Bambu printers are also very expensive, if not more so for their dual nozzle thing compared to, say, the Snapmaker U1 others have already mentioned), are ignorant that Prusa Core One is CoreXY, assumed I was positioning the Core One as a competitor to the A1 (any sane person would immediately see that's just wrong, I did word it a bit weirdly and that's been edited to be more clear, but it doesn't change my point that Bambu Lab machines are not super reliable like you suggest)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It doesn't compete with those higher end machines because it's twice the price for the same feature set.

    More repairable and reliable based on what, your feelings? I can completely understand your dislike for Bambu, but their printers are fantastic for the price. What specific "difficult issues" are you referring to exactly?

    I realize the Core One is CoreXY. Maybe you're new to the scene, but Prusa didnt have a CoreXY machine until years after Bambu had changed the game and every other Chinese company had already cloned them. They were still relying on their MK line selling everyone $300 printers for $1000 back then. Now they're behind the ball and keep running into delays and issues with their new crop of printers and multi-matetial systems all while continuing to charge premium prices.

    I didnt ignore the Elegoo. Your comment directly stated that the Core One was comparable to the A1. The Elegoo printer is actually a better value than both Bambu and Prusa (assuming that its also reliable).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    The Prusa Core One competes with the higher end Bambu Lab machines, mate! And you have ignored that Prusa machines are way more repairable and reliable. Also, the Core One is a COREXY machine, what are you on about with bedslingers. The A1 is also a bedsligner but I don't see you complaining.

    Also, you seemed to have ignored the Elegoo Centauri Carbon (which is similarly priced, CoreXY, enclosure, super awesome in general)

    I did not say Prusa was super competitve in the low end, that's why the Elegoo Centauri Carbon was mentioned!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    Counter suggestion, FlashForge is pretty reliable when it comes to things that just work out of the box. I have an AD5X and it put out the first print before I had all the packagintlg picked up. There are a few quality of life changes I've had to make, it's built to be plug and play and because of that some of the more esoteric things have to be jailbroken. All the same, it does 4 color and the enclosure kit is self printed, it's been incredibly reliable, and I've had less failed prints than I have successes with some models. I can't do high detailed minis with it but I also don't need to babysit it, half the time I'm printing from a different room and don't even check on it.

    All in all, it's a fantastic gateway to the hobby and when you get in deep enough to run into it's limitations, it's still a reliable workhorse to run on the side of something more finely tuned.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    The Prusa Core One is $1,000-$1300 USD what do you mean its the same price as a $359 A1? I think Prusa's days are numbered as they didn't bother to innovate and instead thought selling $1000 bed slingers would tide them over until the end of eternity. Now they're scrambling to stay relevant but refuse to bring down their insane pricing.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    The bigger the print volume, usually the more finicky fine-tuning is. It's just because there's a lot more weight/belt path/etc for things to go wonky. But my makerspace's 350mm³ machines have definitely come in clutch on occasion, even if the vast majority of our patrons' requests are smaller.

    For filaments, they're MOSTLY all compatible everywhere, with just a couple exceptions:

    • The defacto standard diameter is 1.75mm, but 2.85mm is still being made (mostly because of Ultimaker), so make sure you get the right size for your machine.
    • If the material needs to be printed at higher than ~250C, you'll need an all-metal hotend. The cheaper kind of hotend uses PTFE inside and that'll start offgassing toxins above 250C.
    • Some 3d printer brands have started putting RFID chips in their own line of filament, and making it difficult-to-impossible for the machine to accept anything but those. Bambulabs wants to do this SO BAD lol.
    • If the filament itself offgases toxins, you'll want an enclosed printer with some kind of filtration.

    Also, I would say that the reputation Bambulabs has for being easy/plug-and-play is overblown. Not that other printers are any more plug-and-play, just that Bambulabs are no better. And when things inevitably DO go wrong with one, they're harder and more expensive to fix. You wouldn't believe how many of our 3d printing patrons sheepishly admit "actually I have a printer at home but it's broken right now" or "I couldn't get it to do this print". One guess which printer they usually have.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    It really comes down to what you have on hand/ parts for and how much you want to spend. I'm currently rocking an orbiter 2.5 on my A4T v1 and have been pretty happy with it (most of my complaints are around interactions with my BoxTurtle - filament can sometimes get snagged on the lip that cradels the ptfe tube and I had to mess with the guide that sits after the gears for the same reason), it's a really good out of the box extruder, but does cost a bit more upfront (11/11 and black Friday aren't all that far off if you're looking for discounts on parts though).

    Not to throw another hat in the ring, but if I needed an extruder in a pinch, I've seen folks in the BoxTurtle discord swear by the Wrist Watch extruder. Mostly because it uses the same BMG gears/ motor that stealthburner does, so I'd just need plastic parts and configs to get back up and running.

    Unfortunately, I can't speak to the Sherpas. I've been meaning to throw one on my v0.2, but haven't quite gotten that far yet (currently on a side quest reworking my v2.4 and don't want more than one printer down at a time).

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

    I have an A1 and I hate it. It's so stupid that they are locking down on their ecosystem, and I fervantly despise that they are trying to take down that fork of OrcaSlicer (despite their own software being a fork of a fork!)

    it's affordable

    Elegoo's Centauri Carbon has an enclosure and is CoreXY, so objectively much better value than the A1

    works great

    Until it doesn't. The nozzle of my A1 has clogged, and it is difficult to fix. The Prusa Core One is more reliable and repairable for a similar price and performance to the equivalent Bambu machine (edit: to higher end Bambu machines, obviously it doesn't compete with the A1's price bracket. My point still stands that Bambu machines are not the end all be all for reliability).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -3 points 1 day ago*

    Samsung and Microsoft can brick my stuff anytime they want. Sony and Apple could too.

    It sounds like you just want to be contrary, because you didn't buy the same brand and idc enough to keep this going or be in this community any longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    My xbox would be the same.

    And so would my phone.

    Heck, I have a first Gen Oculus Vr headset. Its been shut off of updates and can't do anything really so it's the same.

    That's not a me problem, thats companies being absolute dicks.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    Does it really matter? The point is it puts control of the printer in Bambu labs hands, should they decide to they can just stop your printer from working and brick it.

    Why are you OK with someone else owning and controlling the things you bought?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    Get a Snapmaker U1, Bambu is pushing more and more into things to lock you into their ecosystem, and have shady ass business practices, the U1 is an all around better printer for the same price range

  • source
  • view more: next ›