Never been able to figure out what the hell the last guy is supposed to be in the bottom right of the image. A super hero of some sort?
And how practical do you think it is to replace every take home essay with something that rigorous?
Have you ever proctored an exam before?
If you can't articulate why schools use long essays, perhaps you shouldn't suggest scrapping them. One should know how a machine works before one starts tinkering with it. And a course is a machine like any other. Don't start pulling out pieces before you know what they do.
Frankly I want no screening. People should be able to alter their own sex characteristics at will. I believe in a fundamental freedom of sex. Your body is your own, and the government has no rightful say in what you do with it.
Make it even more inexplicable. Ice guillotine.
No. You're just so used to people saying "social security will go broke in x years," that you've let it degrade your reading comprehension.
That's not something any Democrat would ever do.
You shouldn't care, but most straight women do. Straight women are uniquely prejudiced against bisexual men.

I for one want to know what the hell is going on in the heads of the handful of bisexual women that wouldn't date another bisexual woman. 🤣
Seriously. I'm bi. Like, objectively undeniably bi. I've had cis partners of both sexes. I've had long-term relationships with both. I'm not one of those people that's bi on paper but has only ever dated one sex or gender.
And yet, I'm happily married to my husband. We're in a fully monogamous, exclusive, committed relationship. Been married for eight years. I said "til death do us part," and I meant it! Still do.
Being bi just means you're attracted to more than one sex or gender. The idea that I would ever tell my partner something like, "well you see, there are just some physical needs that you as a man are incapable of meeting..." is just a porn fantasy. I don't have some irresistible need to be with both men and women. I just find some people attractive regardless of gender.
Different but wrong. I am always interested to know what people’s guesses are for the total number of deaths caused by Chernobyl, because it’s remarkably low in my opinion.
There were roughly 350,000 innocent human beings who had to abandon their homes due to Chernobyl. The death total was only so low because hundreds of thousands of people had to literally flee for their lives.
You support nuclear for psychological reasons, not for technological reasons. It gives you a sense of superiority over your fellow human beings. The real reason nuclear is a dead technology is that it's simply not cost competitive with renewables and batteries, but you're here pretending that it's a bunch of scared superstitious ignorant environmentalists that are dragging it down. THOSE common fools just don't know the science. THOSE morons just aren't rational actors like you are. THEY are just to lazy to read about nuclear plant designs.
You're engaged in a comforting form of self-delusion. The actual barriers to nuclear have nothing to do with people just being irrationally afraid of fission. But you ignore this because it gives you a sense of intellectual superiority.
You support nuclear for psychological rather than technological reasons. Fission is just your sports team.
















